<p>Well, wong, I thought since he says that he should have heeded Robinson’s Crusoe words, he might not have been enthused. If he was, he wouldn’t have sat there “hapless” and would start writing immedietely. Also, since the narrator is a butler and the other guy is the narrator’s “sir,” one would expect him to be courteous.</p>
<p>@gthopeful: yes scope compared to the result</p>
<p>The answer for the physics question is definitely arbitrary. Neither author talked about the complexity of math.</p>
<p>I got ???/employ for the children’s book question.</p>
<p>was the answer fanciful/exploit or ___/employ?</p>
<p>boston: Yea i got employ</p>
<p>Boston-
The answer for the physics question is definitely arbitrary. Neither author talked about the complexity of math. </p>
<p>^exactly my reasoning.</p>
<p>i also got “fanciful and exploit” for the children’s book one.</p>
<p>@ boston1993 I remember reading a specific sentence that talked about the complexity of math in passage 1.</p>
<p>for the “defamed” question - what exactly was it asking about the innocent people?</p>
<p>@boston1993</p>
<p>Again, the first passage explicitly mentions the words “complex mathematics”.</p>
<p>@boston1993, the author mentioned the complexity of the mathematics involved with string theory a few times in the first passage and even in the end says that mathematicians and physicists have yet to come up with a full explanation. </p>
<p>The hardest part about interpreting string theory is the difficulty of the math involved in the calculations.</p>
<p>CR Consolidated List</p>
<h2>27/67</h2>
<p>Sentence Completions</p>
<h2>7/19</h2>
<p>ostensibly(not salient)
squalid(not cataclysmic)
tycoon/philanthropist
succinctly
archeaologist
ferocity/contentious (not accuracy/inexact)
______/employ(about children’s books being inaccurate) or fanciful/exploit?</p>
<hr>
<p>Passage Based Questions</p>
<h2>20/48</h2>
<p>1) chimpanzees
2) physics string theory</p>
<h2>3) stolen diamond w/ lawyer and butler</h2>
<p>2)author of passage 2 would be in complete agreement
3)butler was deferential at lawyer
prudent (mom going to college with daughter)
typical answer(daughter’s italics remarks)
3)‘want’ means lack of
2)superhuman computer represents lack of technology to use it as a tool
2)passage 2 would say that the mathematicians and physicians should pursue different avenues
3)“as soon as he turned his back” showed his eagerness
3)the quote from robert crusoe represented an omen
3)growing sense of alarm(in lawyer)/moment of perplexity
3)Only repeated meant brevity of interval
1)look in chimpanzee’s eye/raising of hand shows relation between empathy and technology
3)cost means personal toll
1)chimpanzees were cracking nuts
3)puffery was self-regard and exaggeration
lying passage - qualification
welsh passage - her nationality wasn’t her most important characteristic
3)innocent people were defamed
2)passage 1 says reason string theory is hard to prove is because of complexity of mathematics</p>
<h2>2)fits and starts was sudden bursts</h2>
<h2>Passage 3 is here: <a href=“http://collins.thefreelibrary.com/The-Moonstone/1-1[/url]”>http://collins.thefreelibrary.com/The-Moonstone/1-1</a></h2>
<p>Probable curve: <a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-...est-Curves.pdf</a></p>
<h2>It will be on the easy side probably in the 3rd or 4th slot.</h2>
<p>keep adding/put a question mark and repost the list with your reason if you disagree</p>
<p>Yeah even I remember reading in Passage 1 that the math in string theory is so complex that eve basic equations cannot be formulated.</p>
<p>I said fanciful/exploit - the question was something like: “Although children’s books can be _<strong><em>, teachers can _</em></strong> them to teach important lessons.”</p>
<p>The first word of the employ answer didn’t fit the first blank - maybe lifelike? That’s all I remember.</p>
<p>Dang, does anyone remember what the other answers were for the mathematics question? I can’t remember what I said…</p>
<p>i think one of the options for the arbitrary/complexity of math question was difficulty of studying subatomic something</p>
<p>and also - cost/personal loss question? can someone elaborate on its context? stressing here haha</p>
<p>Wait was it not (fanicful/exploit)</p>
<p>yes it was lifelike</p>
<p>yes passage 1 spoke about math complexity and not knowing the equations of the theory</p>
<p>I don’t remember anything about the complexity of math. But whatever.</p>
<p>I still think the answer was arbitrary. Because the complexity of math is irrelevant to the question.</p>
<p>Its got to be fanciful/exploit</p>
<p>exploit means to derive benefit from</p>
<p>OH. Yeah, for that question I said “difficulty of studying subatomic particles.” So that’s not right? Shizz.</p>
<p>Ummm…can people talk about the Mexican (or whatever nationality) artist passage…the one bout how she loved dresses and other masks and frames…something like that…</p>