<p>Nah africa/chimps was the real deal. </p>
<p>By the way, on the consolidated list, can anyone jog my memory on the question that involved the supposed answer choices ferocity and contentious…I know for sure I put something else</p>
<p>prudent (mom going to college with daughter)</p>
<p>i put sentimental because she was going to wait until the separation caused them to miss each other</p>
<p>typical answer(daughter’s italics remarks)</p>
<p>i put predictable response or something for this one</p>
<p>THE CHIMPANZEES WERE NOT CRACKING NUTS…it showed insight into human nature of some sort. It mentioned nothing about them eating afterwards.</p>
<p>@Bassir: I did not have a passage about africa. are you referring to the chimps?</p>
<p>i have two questions
Are you sure its defamed…i thought i was somthing about their memories
And what was the question for startling…i dont remeber that</p>
<p>And prattennis you were supposed to infer they were cracking nuts</p>
<p>@prattennis_1</p>
<p>it was the one that talked about scientists and something about the mid 19th century
i had put accuracy and inexact but I know its wrong</p>
<p>for the mother/daughter passage I really wanted to choose “annoyed”, but I am confident I ended up settling on another answer</p>
<p>I like the string theory passage. I’m pretty sure I got every single question right in that one.
I hated the chimpanzee passage and the lawyer/butler passage. </p>
<p>I’m expecting to get like -5 passages and -4 vocab…around a 670</p>
<p>Wow I hate CR so much…</p>
<p>"THE CHIMPANZEES WERE NOT CRACKING NUTS…it showed insight into human nature of some sort. It mentioned nothing about them eating afterwards.</p>
<p>^This. Is correct. The author was trying to make chimps seem human-like throughout the whole passage.</p>
<p>I also didnt think that the string theory one was as hard as everyone is making it out to be.</p>
<p>The string theory one was not really THAT bad, I think I did pretty well on it.</p>
<p>what was answer to both passages agree on which of the following (for string theory).</p>
<p>I don’t think I spent enough time pondering the SC questions this time. kept watching the clock, it led to my demise. by the way, mid-19th centuries scientists one…I think it was something else? I remember it being more significant than just accuracy/inexact…something insightful</p>
<p>@boston</p>
<p>But it mentioned the chimps in line 8 which were using tools to crack nuts.</p>
<p>can someone please tell me the question to commonplace startling</p>
<p>when I first saw the string theory question, I automatically assumed it would be something instrumentally related. therefore I felt like a dumbass when I began to read…could’ve been a reason behind my fail</p>
<p>There was a passage about some guy who went to Africa who was African American etc…</p>
<p>I believe the second string theory passage was a paraphrased version of the preface of this book, available on google books: [Not</a> even wrong: the failure of … - Google Books](<a href=“Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in ... - Peter Woit - Google Books”>Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in ... - Peter Woit - Google Books)</p>
<p>I think the chimps were cracking nuts because this is what made the place look like a factory</p>
<p>hotinpursuit-</p>
<p>Care to explain the “mathematics being too complex” in the String Theory passage if you said you think you got everything correct?</p>
<p>thats probably right. the passage as a whole led me to infer that chimps were closely related to humans, though. That was my basic reason behind choosing E for that one.</p>