<p>Prat: The question I think was why did the lawyer only want people to write about what they knew and nothing else.</p>
<p>i dont really have an opinion on any of the passages. i love every passage i read on the sat, frankly.</p>
<p>the question which had hearsay as an answer was asking what the lawyer meant when he said let’s get the info as far as family… idk something like that…</p>
<p>“as soon as he turned his back” showed his eagerness- I am pretty sure this was courtesy, as he was not eager at all to write the peice. Hoiwever, we saw that he was deferential in a previous question and as a butler, he would need to show courtesy. This emphasizes the fact that the butler was only writing the peice because he HAD to, not because he was EAGER to.</p>
<p>if hotpursuit is still making the consolidated list, I believe acumen was an answer to a SC question. agreed?</p>
<p>did anyone put ludicrously instead of succinctly because the drawing were drawn by cartoonist… ?</p>
<p>Why wasn’t the defamed one “lost memory” then?</p>
<p>I thought as time went on, the innocent people began to forget stuff.</p>
<p>why would he write it as soon as he turned his back, implying that he has left the room, if he wasn’t eager to write it? he didnt have a deadline or anything</p>
<p>pratt, what was the question that had ‘acumen’ as an answer? I don’t recall putting down acumen at all…</p>
<p>@best i did…</p>
<p>yeah i dont remember acumen either</p>
<p>hearsay was about the account to be based only on what people had effectively witnessed or something like that, thus not based on hearsay</p>
<p>also, the defereitnal was toward the lawyer, not franklin.</p>
<p>i dont remember putting acument either.</p>
<p>guys, do you remember anything from the passages of woman who likes flamboyant style, chimpanzee&human comparisons (love, technology, language that brought people together, etc), that novel about stolen diamond, and string theory?
let’s add onto that only 1/2 completed list!!!</p>
<p>I remember putting down lucid as a sentence completion (But I had an experimental CR section, so can anyone confirm this?)</p>
<p>cannot remember lucid</p>
<p>was the critical reading section about the venetian city life and the weathers experimental?</p>
<p>^ I didn’t have it</p>
<p>For “passage 1 says reason string theory is hard to prove is because of complexity of mathematics”</p>
<p>I was stuck between “a testament to the complexity of the theory” and “a consequence of the difficulty of the mathematics” or whatever they said. Can anyone explain why the math one was correct?</p>
<p>yup 10char</p>
<p>@Linger, I also remember lucid, it was #7. and the one right after was the ostensibly one.</p>
<p>If I didn’t have the Vienna experimental, what was the other possibility of an experimental?</p>