<p>Im currently an undergrad finance major at Texas A&M. My school has an M.S. program in marketing that's 38 hours and that accepts students with no work experience. Average GMAT score is 620 (Its competitive though, only 35 spots per year): Mays</a> Business School :: Master of Science in Marketing</p>
<p>MBAs by contrast take 48 hours and the good schools expect quality work experience. The site claims that the average salary for 2006 graduates was $62k, and for 2007 grads was $65k (Mays</a> Business School :: MS/MKTG FAQ</p>
<p>Assuming I score high enough on the GMAT, should I do this program instead of getting an MBA? Im definitely interested in marketing, but I want to get the best value, and im not sure how MSs are treated.</p>
<p>Let's say I'm approaching this purely from the standpoint of which will offer me greater financial returns. An MBA student at A&M starts at a mean of 87,000 a year. (<a href="http://mba.tamu.edu/multimedia/MBA07placement.pdf)%5B/url%5D">http://mba.tamu.edu/multimedia/MBA07placement.pdf)</a>, and has an average GMAT of ~640.</p>
<p>So that's an extra 22k in salary, but we also have to take into consideration that those MBA grads probably have 3-5 years work experience on average.</p>
<p>So all other things equal, would I have better prospects at age 30 with a marketing focused MBA or an M.S. in marketing?</p>