<p>I've checked out the guidelines here: Men's</a> Track Recruiting Guidelines</p>
<p>I'm confused by some things and would like people's opinions:</p>
<ol>
<li>Tier I vs Tier II. I take this to mean that Tier I are some of the better Track Schools (maybe the top 100 +/-? here's last year's top 25: NCAA</a> Division I Men's Outdoor Track & Field Rankings - NCAA.com) and Tier II are still DI, but not as good. Meaning, there are LOT of DI schools not nationally ranked, but still recruiting. They may recruit a boy who runs a 4:25 1600m, for example, vs the 4:15 Tier I guideline.</li>
</ol>
<p>(From what I've seen, the Ivy's are at or near Tier I. I've heard that Yale's looking for 4:21 or better for 1600m, for example. Princeton's a legit Tier I. Their roster is loaded. So is Columbia.) </p>
<ol>
<li><p>Does anybody have any insight on D3 NESCAC or UAA schools? Seems like if you break 4:30 as a Jr in the 1600m, you're a solid recruit.</p></li>
<li><p>Walk on vs. Recruit. I know that getting a significant athletic scholarship for men's track is rare. I've also read where some of the top DI men's programs will give you help with admissions, no scholarship and expect you to walk on (see Jay Johnson's blog when he was a recruiting coordinator with CU, for example). If you do well, you may get $ later during your athletic career. From what I've researched, some walk ons get help. Some don't. Depends on the school. Any thoughts on DI vs D3 NESCAC / UAA on this?</p></li>
</ol>