<p>Just for any lurkers not watching the news...</p>
<p>I have lost ALL faith in the American Justice System.</p>
<p>Not surprising at all to me. Even if he really did molest that kid, the prosecution's case was weak. The entire affair was a farce. If Michael is smart, he will be very careful concerning his contact with children in the future.</p>
<p>Interesting how some people think they can reach a better decision than a jury presented with all the evidence with the due process of law.</p>
<p>^^^yes, i agree.</p>
<p>its all thanks to the mom</p>
<p>I never thought Michael Was guilty. But I do agree, he does need to watch his contact with children in the futrue. Im Happy he is not guilty. I do think think that the jury should of had at least one african american person, but that is my personal opinion.</p>
<p>either way, I think it shows that they all had a nonbiased opinion.</p>
<p>I'm glad he's relieved of that ****. Props to the greatest singer of all time.</p>
<p>^^ I definitally agree with you. I'm glad this is over, and Michael Jackson is THE King of Pop</p>
<p>yes. i never believed he was guilty in the first place. michael jackson rocks =P</p>
<p>If he wasnt a musical superstar, I GUARANTEE all of you would want him locked up. What kind of sick freak sleeps with children anyway. If hes not guilty, he should at least be in a mental institution. By the way, his music sucks.</p>
<p>the problem is, there was no evidence that he DOES sleep with kids, something you wouldn't even suspect unless he were a famous personality who is featured on tv a lot. So your accusation can go both ways.</p>
<p><em>gasp</em>.......Michael Jackson = good music :p</p>
<p>No, it was an elaborate conspiracy.</p>
<p>The 20 some housekeepers that said they saw everything from sleeping in the nude (w/ kids) to oral sex in the shower were just disgruntled they didn't get paid enough.</p>
<p>The 11 year old kid who was diagnosed with inoperable cancer just wanted money! (probably true in regard to his mother, but the fact remains he was porbably molested).</p>
<p>The 15 year old record of him doing the ...exact...same...thing is inconsequential.</p>
<p>...and of course</p>
<p>McKully(sp) Kulkin slept in his boxers with MJ and he didn't molest HIM, therefore he must be a stand up guy.</p>
<p>Face it, where there's this much smoke there's fire.</p>
<p>vomits</p>
<p>Hey, even with this much smoke there's reasonable doubt that there's no fire. (Maybe it was a chemical reaction?) And after all, reasonable doubt is all that matters in a criminal case.</p>
<p>and the man is a father........</p>
<p>who will no be allowed to do the same thing to his kids...</p>
<p>i feel sorry for his kids. the guy is seriously a complete nut case.</p>
<p>They'll catch him soon enough...when his nose breaks off and gets stuck in some poor kid's butt. lol</p>