<p>lol, what a freak</p>
<p>This man went from black to white, has no nose, thinks he's Peter Pan, frequently invites young boys to his house. What else do you need as proof ? :)</p>
<p>Apparently more than eyewitness accounts of him giving oral sex in the shower (from his own adult staff) and a 15 year history of doing the exact same things.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>The prosecution's case was admittedly weak.</p></li>
<li><p>All the defense had to do was establish reasonable doubt.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>And some of you are surprised he was acquitted why?</p>
<p>because he has fondled boys for 15 years now?</p>
<p>Was OJ innocent, as well?</p>
<p>
[quote]
The prosecution's case was admittedly weak.
[/quote]
On conspiracy to imprison them. On everything else it was a slam dunk. His own staff testified against him, the documentary, etc, etc, etc.</p>
<p>Its OBVIOUS that MJ is a child abuser. Just look at his background !</p>
<p>Yeah. Did you see the jury at their press conference. The people here at CC are way smarter than they are. Granted the mother was a complete pain in the ass, but we aren't trying the mother. If I was molested and it went to trial my mom would be crying on the stand, not snapping her fingers. But still. Even though I really don't like Chris Matthew's from MSNBC's HardBall, I have to take his question into consideration. Just because he is "not guilty" doesn't mean he is completely innocent - just the prosecution's case was awful. The mother killed their case. Perhaps he really is innocent, but he still is weird, and as many analysts said, they wouldn't trust their kids with him.</p>
<p>
[quote]
On conspiracy to imprison them. On everything else it was a slam dunk. His own staff testified against him, the documentary, etc, etc, etc.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Who said anything about OJ being innocent? The defense in the OJ and MJ case apparently did an excellent job of establishing reasonable doubt on pratically every angle the prosecution attempted to pursue. Or the jurors are morons. Matter of opinion. The mother sank the case for the prosecution. What can I say contradications will do such.</p>
<p>The point of reasonable doubt is not necessarily to proclaim the defendant's innocence but to create the room for various possibilities which incites doubt. Hence the term, "not guility"--not synonymous with "innocent"</p>
<p>I think he's crazy, but he's not a criminal. Counseling should have been part of the jury's decision. I doubt he ever really harmed a child, but he is a bit nutty.</p>
<p>I think the way to test to see if he's guilty is to ask the kids who were supposedly molested if michael's thriller was black or white. :)</p>
<p>LMAO... good one, bern700 !!</p>
<p>Anyone going to buy his music now?</p>
<p>Anyone going to avoid buying his music?</p>
<p>
[quote]
Anyone going to buy his music now?</p>
<p>Anyone going to avoid buying his music?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>You speak a language I am unfamiliar with. What is to "buy music?" You mean give money for a cd? That is such a foreign concept to me...</p>
<p>hmmm.... You guys are way way to fast to pass unfounded judgement. Sounds like as Greenday says "American Idiot... a NATION CONTROLLED BY THE MEDIA."</p>
<p>Michael is still BLACK, and he just has issues, everyone does some more then others. Some people need to get their facts straight how do you go from black to white not possioble.</p>
<p>two words.... Plastic surgury</p>
<p>Plastic Surgery can't make you BLACK</p>
<p>Michael Jackson is not black; he is white. He has a skin disease so he must bleach his skin white unless he wants random white blotches mixed with his black skin. You don't tell someone who has bleached blonde hair that they have brown hair do you? Didn't think so.</p>
<p>I agree with the people that said the prosecution presented a weak case. They royally botched the entire presentation especially the timeline of events. But I still think he is guilty regardless of the jury verdict. He will continue to committ lewd acts around minors, and he will probably continue to get off free too.</p>
<p>Just to let u know, all us MJ supporters are still here, prepping our princeton review's: "How to Get Mike Free" in preparation for the invasion! If Michael was still supersexy and more confident about himself as he was back in the day, you would not have your arguments anymore. Too many people nowadays throw feces at him because superficially, they resent the disfigured outside and fail to see the musical, brilliant inside.</p>
<p>"He will continue to committ lewd acts around minors"</p>
<p>"Ugly" people commit lewd acts. When was the last time someone sexy got in trouble for say, going nude or ****ing in public, or for rape? Somehow I've never seen a woman "raped" by a sexy guy ;).</p>
<p>The thing is, Mike is a chill guy. He loves kids and he's a helluva lot softer nowadays because of his insecurities. That doesn't make him a bad person, and it sure as hell shouldn't play so much against him in the public's eye.</p>
<p>Now, ask yourself this...If Mike was sexy, would you believe him to fondle kids in his free time? Hell, if he was still sexy, I'd bet many of you women wouldnt dislike some MJ fondling! Ferment on that idea for a while eh?! </p>
<p>The biggest pimp that ever lived -
<a href="http://eil.com/newgallery/Michael-Jackson-Thriller-235657.jpg%5B/url%5D">http://eil.com/newgallery/Michael-Jackson-Thriller-235657.jpg</a></p>
<p>^ is this a joke? MJ should be castrated, beat, and imprisoned, then buried in a pile of feces. The South Park episode was right, he's a sick, demented freak.</p>
<p>P.S. his music sucks</p>