Minority really isn't that big of a deal...

<p>Someone asked for the study I was talking about:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.harvardmagazine.com/on-line/050547.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.harvardmagazine.com/on-line/050547.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>
[quote]
The results for three special groups of applicants—underrepresented minority students, legacies, and recruited athletes—stand in sharp contrast. Members of each of these groups have a decidedly better chance of being admitted, at any specified SAT level, than do their fellow applicants, including those from low-SES categories. The average boost in the odds of admission is about 30 percentage points for a recruited athlete, 28 points for a member of an underrepresented minority group, and 20 points for a legacy. For example, an applicant with an admissions probability of 40 percent based on SAT scores and other variables would have an admissions probability of 70 percent if he or she were a recruited athlete, 68 percent if an underrepresented minority, and 60 percent if a legacy. Applicants who participate in early decision programs also enjoy a definite admissions advantage—about 20 percentage points at the 13 institutions for which we have data.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>You have to scroll down the page a bit to see that.</p>