<p>
[quote]
I know schools practice AA. What I said is if the schools today said they no longer practice AA how would you know any different, and you responded by saying that there are "plenty of ways" to know. What I want is not another overt statement from the schools, but to see what these "plenty" of other ways you mention are.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I’ll give my opinion.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Tech schools, particularly private ones, would start to look like Caltech or Georgia Tech. Instead of the 45/55 MIT-style gender ratio, we’d see a 28/72 Caltech-style gender ratio or a 31/69 Georgia Tech-style gender ratio. All of these schools are “affirmative action / equal opportunity” employers, but I would guess that MIT considers gender in a different way than either Caltech or GT.</p></li>
<li><p>I would expect top-tier public universities to have fewer so-called “under-represented” minority students. (See: Berkeley, UCLA, Michigan after a Court ruled that they had to comply with Proposal 2.)</p></li>
<li><p>I would expect “under-represented” minority enrollment to increase at less selective public universities.</p></li>
</ol>