Monarch Butterfly CR Passage

<p>Can we try to compile a list of answers/questions..?</p>

<p>What do the 2 passage views have in common?</p>

<p>What do lines whatever in passage 2 relate to passage 1 second paragraph?
Passage 1 describe's the researcher's intended experiment; Passage 2 describes the chracter of Wenner (sp?)</p>

<p>Last question in the set,
answer: E, Passage 2 criticizes an experiment done in Passage 1</p>

<p>First question in the set,
What is the significance of "mapped the course" in line 3?
A) to show the insight needed for te experiment</p>

<p>In line __, "open Kansas", what does open mean?
"unobstructable"</p>

<p>Contribute some more guys!</p>

<p>Both say they change location in winter.</p>

<p>I agree with your 2nd one.</p>

<p>Agree with 3rd.</p>

<p>I didn't say A), but rather to show the painstaking detail. A) had something with methodology, not experiemtn.</p>

<p>Open was unobstructed.</p>

<p>How would passage 1 argue against the claim that she wanted the results to occur as said in Passage 2? </p>

<p>"Theories do not need hard evidence"
"Theories are harder to disprove than to prove"</p>

<p>I think I left that blank, but what did you all put?</p>

<p>haha neb145 i got the same answers as you again</p>

<p>I said that Passage 1 would argue that she had observational data to base her conclusions on (this is arguing against the cart in front of the horse line).</p>

<p>I put everything neb154 has said.</p>

<p>i said the mapping shows painstaking detail...?</p>

<p>i put "painstaking blah blah"</p>

<p>I agree with you guys so far... but what about the one "Her (1st passage) experience with false stuff because of vanishing bearing would most support the claim made by Wenner that..."</p>

<p>Was it that her statistics were analyzed incorrectly?</p>

<p>that the wind carried them</p>

<p>CRAP. I was going to put that, but in the second passage it really said nothing about his opinions of what the wind does. It just talked about data analysis, not wind.</p>

<p>someone had "fortuitous circumstance" for the answer?</p>

<p>Don't think so... do you remember the question?</p>

<p>OMG PLEAse tell me this is gonna be the experimental section. this has got to be the worst passage ever! my brain shut off</p>

<p>according to line82-85 (these lines talking about if butterflies are intentional), how will Wenner explained the butterflied fly to blahblah?</p>

<p>bannana, no, I only had 3 CR sections. So that was NOT exper.</p>

<p>i had fortuitous circumstances as an answer</p>

<p>WHAT WAS THE QUESTION? Or at least, some of the other answer choices?</p>

<p>this was the most random a$$ crap passage ever. omg omg omg i missed like 3 or 4 on this passage alone...CR WAS OMFG HARD</p>

<p>First, the Butterfly Paired Passage Definitely Counted!</p>

<p>Here are the questions and answers I remember:</p>

<ol>
<li>Wenner's attitude is DISMISSIVE.</li>
<li>As Wenner understands it, migration implies AN ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
(this one was close. I almost put INSTINCTIVE BEHAVIOR)</li>
<li>Open = UNOBSTRUCTED</li>
<li>PAINSTAKING NATURE OF THE ENDEAVOR (has to do with the first paragraph of passage 1 ie mapping all of the lines)</li>
<li>FORTUITOUS CIRCUMSTANCES</li>
<li>Does anyone remember "ALL ENCOMPASSING SKEPTICISM as an answer?</li>
<li>I put an answer that had to do with the return trip.</li>
<li>"WIND" figured in at least two of my answers</li>
</ol>