<p>when I use PR [princeton review] I get a 34 in math whereas if I use a test in the red book I get a 31. The red is harder but which is more accurate? </p>
<p>I know the red is called the Real Act, but is it really? </p>
<p>thanks --</p>
<p>Thats weird. Red book is past ACT tests, and PR is suppose to be just a tad harder.</p>
<p>The Red is more accurate ofcourse.....its just past ACTs</p>
<p>The red book is the most accurate since it is comprised of old ACTs. PR is the next best book -- it has great strategies, and it's practice tests are just a little bit harder than the real thing.</p>
<p>Actually, they are about the same. I believe Kaplan is easier than both the Red book and PR and people only say it's hard because the scale is harsh.</p>
<p>so then, I should figure out how to get a 34 in the red book... haha
btw, do you guys have science tips? a lot of it seems like chance. if you know the stuff, youre good otherwise it takes super long to look it up... maybe its just me o.o</p>
<p>read the little one or two sentence blurb (usually in italics) and then go straight to the questions.. don't read any of it UNLESS it is a scientist 1 vs. scientist 2 (or experiment 1 vs. experiment 2) question.. usually, one of those is on each science section.. but the other 6 passages are all figures, graphs, and whatnot.. on those, just go straight to the question</p>
<p>real act is accurate, all ways expect your actual score to be about 2-3 point below you PR SCORE AND ABOUT 1 POINT BELOW YOUR REAL ACT SCORE</p>