<p>I've only been here a little while, but I get the sense that average is a word that most people here would not like applied to them. However, the reality is that no one can be perfect at everything. </p>
<p>With that in mind, I'm wondering about myself and my musical skills in relation to college admissions. I play violin, a pretty competitive instrument since so many play. Because I have other passions and time commitments, I simply can't devote the 2hrs a day to practicing that some people can. 1 hr a day is my usual, but I'm really only average as a violinist. While I can play well, participate in district orchestra, and do solo recitals (not professional) several times a year, I'm definitely not a virtuoso. </p>
<p>Despite all that, I really love violin. The hour I spend practicing every day is a great destressor. It's a welcome break from homework, sports practice, and the frenzy of every day life. I'm not unaccomplished; I'm just not really outstanding. I'm in the top orchestra at the school, I'm vice president of Tri-M this year (junior), I plan various music activities for that, and I perform pieces in recital a couple times a year, once at a solo festival for a judge. </p>
<p>So the question is this... what really matters in admissions? The fact that I love it and have multiple areas of involvement to prove it, or my actual skill relative to others? Orchestra and my related activities are a decent part of my EC involvement. It's not all of it by far, but it's a decent portion. Would it be a bad idea to submit a performance, since those are evaluated by the music faculty there? If my performance is not good, would it seriously hurt my application? </p>
<p>*Note: I'm not applying to any music schools/conservatories, nor do I intend to pursue a music major.</p>