<p>I'm going crazy deciding what to major in. I'm a junior transfer student at Stanford, about a third of the way through an Economics major, having second thoughts. Before going back to school, I was a generalist, and I still (after a year) can't get into the swing of narrowing my interests. I'm also a bit of an intellectual snob and don't want to choose a "soft" major like Communications. </p>
<p>I went in thinking I would do Economics and English, because I wanted to make money and like to read. It turns out that I don't really like the way that English classes analyze literature (it just seems like so much minutia to me). And Economics (childish as it may sound) just seems full of models I don't agree with. (I wrote a post about this earlier, to which I received a number of helpful suggestions, but I still can't seem to narrow it down.)</p>
<p>Here are the ones I'm currently thinking of, with links to the Stanford pages. Any help?</p>
<p>Symbolic Systems (Stanford's version of Cognitive Science):
<a href="http://symsys.stanford.edu%5B/url%5D">http://symsys.stanford.edu</a></p>
<p>Pros:</p>
<ul>
<li>It's cool and interesting.</li>
<li>I'll learn to think better by taking math and logic classes.</li>
<li>I'll learn to program (something useful and geek-credful).</li>
<li>I don't like to shrink from a challenge. I'll be really proud of myself if I do this one.</li>
</ul>
<p>Cons:</p>
<ul>
<li>It has some really, really hard classes in it. (Three of the most difficult at Stanford, they say.)</li>
<li>It requires a lot of units (17 more classes I would have to take, requiring me to stay at least one more quarter, if not two)</li>
<li>I am <i>not</i> naturally good at this stuff. I am very good at memorizing facts and rules and applying them to situations. I am not very good at abstracting principles out of data, finding the base case in inductive proofs, etc. This is both a good and a bad thing, and it causes the GPA and time problems mentioned below as well as the "learning to think better" item above.</li>
<li>My GPA will suck. This is important if I ever want to go to law school, and I might, someday. It's something I really wanted as a kid. </li>
<li>I'm not amazingly hot on their paradigm of cognitive science (which is more about artificial intelligence than about neuroscience).</li>
<li>I'll have to take 3 more classes in the Philosophy department, and so far, I've been pretty uninterested in proving things like Russell's Paradox line by tedious line in the software they provided for us.</li>
<li>It's hard to explain what it is to people.</li>
<li>Because it's so hard and has so many units, I won't have as much time to do other stuff or to take other cool classes</li>
</ul>
<p>Human Biology (Interdisciplinary Biology): <a href="http://www.stanford.edu/dept/humbio/%5B/url%5D">http://www.stanford.edu/dept/humbio/</a></p>
<p>Pros:</p>
<ul>
<li>It's really intrinsically interesting. It's a BA program, not a BS, that has an interdisciplinary core with cool readings in a lot of subjects (history, economics, biology, linguistics).</li>
<li>I took three classes last quarter to test it out and they were all extremely interesting and enjoyable.</li>
<li>I only have to do about 9 more classes. </li>
<li>It's a self-designed major after completing a core of 6 classes, so I could choose classes I want to do anyway.</li>
<li>My GPA would be better (see above and take the inverse).</li>
</ul>
<p>Cons:</p>
<ul>
<li>As some people here have told me, "You don't learn to <em>do</em> anything. Because it's so interdisciplinary, you just read about stuff instead of learning a methodology. I'm not sure how I feel about that.</li>
<li>I don't know what I'd do with it. </li>
</ul>
<p>International Relations: <a href="http://www.stanford.edu/dept/IR/%5B/url%5D">http://www.stanford.edu/dept/IR/</a></p>
<p>Pros: </p>
<ul>
<li>It's more interesting than Economics, and, I think, a more accurate description of reality.</li>
<li>It's more interdisciplinary, which means I get to take more classes I like.</li>
<li>My GPA would be better.</li>
</ul>
<p>Cons</p>
<ul>
<li>Doesn't lead as neatly into a finance career.</li>
<li>The Stanford department focuses on the military and states, rather than connections between individuals, societal trends, etc.</li>
<li>It's more "cream-puffy" than Economics.</li>
</ul>
<p>Economics: <a href="http://www-econ.stanford.edu/%5B/url%5D">http://www-econ.stanford.edu/</a></p>
<p>Good ol' familiar Econ.</p>
<p>Pros:</p>
<ul>
<li>I know what I'm getting into.</li>
<li>It does give me an opportunity to improve my mathematical reasoning.</li>
<li>It leads to careers in finance that make money.</li>
<li>It's the substantive social science major, with higher starting salaries than other non-engineering majors.</li>
<li>GPA---moderate between the other two, I guess.</li>
<li>(kind of) I will learn a discipline. As in, learn how a particular type of science (if it is that) thinks about the world.</li>
</ul>
<p>Cons:</p>
<ul>
<li>Grr... I just hate economic modeling. I'm taking a political economy course this summer and I like that a lot more, because it seems to address cause and effect, more than trying to oversimplify reality.</li>
<li>It's a medium-size major, about 11 more classes.</li>
<li>The core prerequisites (of which I still have two left) are pretty boring---and difficult.</li>
</ul>