<p>To begin with, weighted gpas at my school were on a 6.0 scale with AP as a 6.0, honors as a 5.0, and regular as 4.0. This already made it possible to get above 5.0 wGPas, which in and of itself is ludicrous.</p>
<p>This year my school changed its unweighted gpa scale to something even more ridiculous than its weighted scale.
98-100 4.0 A+
94-97 4.0 A
92-93 4.0 A-
90-91 3.8 B+
86-90 3.5 B
84-85 3.0 B-
82-83 2.8 C+
77-81 2.5 C
75-76 2.0 C- and then on down to a D- at 70-71, 1.0</p>
<p>Is this not completely insane? I am frankly getting ****ed off at my school for this, since there were already multiple (about 5) people at the top of the class with 4.0s and the same weighted gpa, since they all took the same schedule. Now someone with straight Bs is somehow a 3.5 student, which should be reserved for someone with equal As and Bs. I sincerely hope that this will coincide with MUCH harder classes, but since my school mentioned that this will make application to scholarships and schools easier... I don't think so.</p>
<p>The scale before was that all grades of the same letter were the same. So all As were 4.0, all Bs were 3.0, etc. The number required for the letters was the same: 92+ for A, 84-91 for B, etc. That might sound somewhat higher than the usual 90-100 but since we have probably double digits of uw 4.0 and multiple people tied for highest wgpa the class difficulty seems to compensate.</p>
<p>My school doesn’t record percentages on our transcripts, just a letter grade, so I suppose this means colleges will be forced to go by my school’s system. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>FWIW, I got an A in AP Chem and a B in gym.</p>
<p>See what I mean?
Its not care that you can slouch off and get an A in AP Chemistry but work your butt off for an A in gym and it counts the same!
Ridiculous!</p>