<p>Mighty Nick and VectorWega, </p>
<p>You both make good points–</p>
<p>Mighty Nick–that the particular program at Ross (since it doesn’t focus as much on a particular major as many BBA programs) is not one that is as conducive to returning to (as a business student) for prospective MBA students </p>
<p>VectorWega–that while business students make up less than 50% of MBA classes, they are still the largest group of MBA students at most schools, on average.</p>
<p>Now if we can agree on your two main points, and can move on from here, I think the discussion might be a bit less heated. </p>
<p>As one who has gone through both an undergraduate and graduate business program, I do believe there is some overlap, but as long as one changes the major at the graduate level, then the overlap may be limited–and the graduate degree is valuable (especially so if you return after a few years in the business world–and therefore can contribute to the regular discussions based upon real world experiences). Most “top” MBA programs select people who have been out-of-school for a few years for this reason. </p>
<p>As far as going back to an MBA program if one was an undergraduate business student, I would imagine that schools where a major is “optional” (such as at Michigan, and at Emory, and even at UC Berkeley) would not be as good a choice as a school which does require a particular focus in a major field (such as accounting, finance, marketing, operations management, strategic management, international business, entrepreneurship, operations research, human resources, or logistics) at both the undergraduate and graduate levels and that had a varying curriculum in each field for each level. </p>
<p>Schools like Harvard, Northwestern, UCLA, USC, NYU, Virginia, Duke, and Texas all fall into this category–and I’m sure there are many others–though I’m not familiar with the curriculum at every business school–and therefore won’t attempt to create a comprehensive list here.</p>