<p>Mighty Nick and VectorWega, </p>
<p>You both make good points--</p>
<p>Mighty Nick--that the particular program at Ross (since it doesn't focus as much on a particular major as many BBA programs) is not one that is as conducive to returning to (as a business student) for prospective MBA students </p>
<p>VectorWega--that while business students make up less than 50% of MBA classes, they are still the largest group of MBA students at most schools, on average.</p>
<p>Now if we can agree on your two main points, and can move on from here, I think the discussion might be a bit less heated. </p>
<p>As one who has gone through both an undergraduate and graduate business program, I do believe there is some overlap, but as long as one changes the major at the graduate level, then the overlap may be limited--and the graduate degree is valuable (especially so if you return after a few years in the business world--and therefore can contribute to the regular discussions based upon real world experiences). Most "top" MBA programs select people who have been out-of-school for a few years for this reason. </p>
<p>As far as going back to an MBA program if one was an undergraduate business student, I would imagine that schools where a major is "optional" (such as at Michigan, and at Emory, and even at UC Berkeley) would not be as good a choice as a school which does require a particular focus in a major field (such as accounting, finance, marketing, operations management, strategic management, international business, entrepreneurship, operations research, human resources, or logistics) at both the undergraduate and graduate levels and that had a varying curriculum in each field for each level. </p>
<p>Schools like Harvard, Northwestern, UCLA, USC, NYU, Virginia, Duke, and Texas all fall into this category--and I'm sure there are many others--though I'm not familiar with the curriculum at every business school--and therefore won't attempt to create a comprehensive list here.</p>