<p>This isn’t wildly inaccurate information; it’s actually mostly accurate. My field is adjunct to neuroscience, btw.</p>
<p>Generally speaking (and I also have this on authority from professors who hire neuroscientists) academics who want to work in the United States should get their PhD in the United States. There are a few international universities that are considered comparable to the U.S., and where some U.S. scholars get their PhDs - Cambridge and Oxford are obvious ones in many fields, for example. But I’ve always heard the advice that if you want to be an American professor and you have the opportunity, get the American PhD. It’s not that an American PhD is more “valuable” objectively; it’s simply that American professors (who are doing the hiring) are more familiar with American departments and universities, and also with American scholars. They are more likely to know your dissertation adviser, the reputation of your department, etc., if you go to a U.S. institution than all but a handful of overseas ones.</p>
<p>I’m not so sure that doing the postdoc overseas is a great idea, either. The reason for that (as a scholar explained to me) is in the sciences, postdocs are expected to either have already or be in the process of securing U.S.-based federal grants, largely from the NIH and the NSF. The granting/funding system works differently internationally than it does here. But U.S.-based departments want faculty who they perceive as being likely to obtain federally funded grants to keep their research going and their prestige high. That’s why many scholars who DID obtain their PhDs internationally end up doing postdoctoral fellowships here in the States (at least in my field, which like I said is related to neuroscience).</p>
<p>Jasari, you have yet to give any reason why you believe that his information is “wildly inaccurate.”</p>
<p>A good idea for any future faculty member is to take a look at the faculties of schools at which you would like to teach. Where did they earn their PhDs? In my field, you rarely see professors at U.S. institutions (especially the very top RU/VH departments) who got their PhDs at international institutions. When they have, are from a concentrated handful of universities. I’m fairly certain that’s true for neuroscience as well. If you are still in undergrad, a good idea would be to ask your own faculty members at your university; they will know the norms and standards in your field. If you like you could also try asking at the Chronicle of Higher Education forums; there are lots of faculty members in STEM fields there. (I’ve heard this advice given there as well, too, btw.)</p>
<p>The other thing to remember, OP, is that if you have a U.S.-based bachelor’s degree, you’ll probably need to get a course/taught master’s before you can be accepted to a European or Australian PhD program, although this will vary by department. As nano said, and you seem to know, international PhDs typically don’t have coursework and start from the dissertation phase, which is why they are shorter in length. However, you won’t have the same graduate-level coursework yet - so you’ll need to take it before you can go to the PhD program. Of course, this isn’t a blanket rule; it’ll vary by school to school so you may need to ask first.</p>
<p>OP, if you want to live internationally for a few years - why don’t you take a few years before the PhD and do that? You could apply for a Fulbright grant and do some research at an international university for a year or two, or you could teach English abroad, or you could find some other opportunity to do international research. It’s also not completely uncommon for some U.S.-based doctoral students to find a reason to study at an international university as a visiting student for a few months to a year.</p>