new attacks?

<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Investigation/story?id=1115448&page=1%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Investigation/story?id=1115448&page=1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>this sucks i have family in BOTH cities!</p>

<p>:(</p>

<p>don't worry, one of these smart CC posters will come explain to you that Bush is actually the one who will order the attacks.</p>

<p>It must make the US & GB feel worse when they are successfully attacked AND they had a fair warning of it.</p>

<p>Yeah if there are more attacks then let's look into those. I never said Bush ochestrated the attacks (believe me that's giving him far too much credit. I think he's an idiot. I think he knew about the CIA's plans or at least knew of the whole operation or maybe allowed it to go into effect but believe me he is not the head of it by any means). </p>

<p>I also never said there aren't terrorists in the world. There certainly are. It is unfortunate that Afganistan will persist in this terror. Just so everyone knows Afganistan is not Iraq (oops wrong country maybe we'd better send some more back to Afganistan)</p>

<p>As long as it aint NYC again, I could care less.</p>

<p>^ Wow... Wow...</p>

<p>:(</p>