<p>
No, this system takes all of that into account.</p>
<p>
[quote=asteriskea]
his update article fills in a few more details on the new wrinkles in UM's holistic admissions process:</p>
<p>Quote:
University officials said Wednesday that they have received a record 27,000 applications from students seeking admission to Michigan next fall. They expect that number to be the largest among Big Ten schools for incoming freshmen.</p>
<p>Roughly 5,500 students are expected in the next freshmen class, although a few thousand more than that will gain admission but decide to go elsewhere or fail to take other steps needed for enrollment.</p>
<p>The admissions process won't be complete for several more weeks. University officials said at a media briefing Wednesday that the admissions process is still thorough, holistic and multifaceted while remaining very selective and competitive.</p>
<p>"We make no bones about the fact diversity is important to us," said Ted Spencer, an associate vice provost for the Ann Arbor school. "It always has been at the University of Michigan."...</p>
<p>Students' files are reviewed at least twice. Some get a third review, and the toughest cases often are settled by a committee.</p>
<p>Student applications include standardized test scores, transcripts of class records, essays and letters of recommendation.</p>
<p>In using Descriptor PLUS, is a database service from The College Board, university officials also have access to an analysis that breaks down students into clusters based on their high schools and their neighborhoods.</p>
<p>The University of Michigan pays $15,000 a year for the service, which is new for this admissions cycle but was adopted before voters passed Proposal 2 in November.</p>
<p>Michigan students typically have grade-point averages of at least 3.7, but other factors - some of which can be brought out through the new database program or in essays and letters of recommendation - influence whether a student is admitted.</p>
<p>**At Wednesday's briefing, university officials used as an example a white male student with a 3.1 grade-point average who has taken fairly tough classes. The student finished high in his class, is considered a school leader, is heavily involved in extracurricular activities and worked on a farm to help his family pay the bills.</p>
<p>His evaluation summary noted parents' estimated income and educational level, race and gender, citizenship and other factors. Evaluators noted that the university probably doesn't get many applicants from the student's high school and that he lived in a high-interest, underrepresented neighborhood.</p>
<p>The student has been offered admission, university officials said.</p>
<p>"We want more kids from those types of schools that have done these types of things," Spencer said.**
</p>
<p>In this case the whole students background was taken into account. Socioeconomic factors, where he went to school, race, gender, and other things. The reason why this isn't against proposal 2 is because their was no predetermined boost given to this student. He got into the school despite having very low scores compared to the average of the school, because of his background. Upon finding more about him they realized that he would still have a good chance of succeeding at the school. This system seems to be a lot better at taking a holistic view of a person.</p>