<p>Anybody see the news story on the 11 o’clock news tonight (05/23/2006) about the overcrowding at UC Davis? Story pointed out that 3 people being squeezed into small 2 person rooms this Fall. Sophomores, Junior, and Seniors having to look for housing off campus because no room for them on campus. They interviewed one UCD student, I think he was a sophomore, and he said, “This sucks”. </p>
<p>They interviewed one of the UCD administrators and he didn’t seem to care. Why am I not surprised.</p>
<p>Maybe the genius administrators at UCD who caused this overbooking problem can start a “hot bunking” program for students like they have on nuclear subs where they have one bunk for two or three people and each person assigned to the bunk gets to use it for eight hours when they are not on duty. </p>
<p>Since freshmen appear to be the only ones who are guaranteed on campus housing at UCD; I wonder what it is going to be like for any upper class students who can’t find on campus housing when they have to go into a highly competitive and tiny local rental market and try to rent an apartment? I’ll bet the local landlords are going to see this as a golden opportunity to jack up rental prices because housing is small and the number of displaced UCD students is going to be so big. Of course you can always move to Sacramento and commute 15 or 20 miles each way to school. Might even be some housing in Vacaville where you commute about 40 miles each way to school. </p>
<p>Here’s some suggestions - When airlines overbook; don’t you get a refund or a free flight plus a hotel room until they can rebook you? How about some rent free rooms or 50% tuition cuts for students? Better yet, maybe some of the Chancellors and Vice-Chancellors can open up their homes and let 5 or 10 UCD students live with them?</p>
<p>I see that Chancellor Vanderhoef recently survived a no confidence vote of the faculty holding tenured, tenure-track and emeriti positions:</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.dateline.ucdavis.edu/dl_detail.lasso?id=8699[/url]”>http://www.dateline.ucdavis.edu/dl_detail.lasso?id=8699</a></p>
<p>The above linked news story says that the resolution sought to “condemn the recent actions” of the chancellor for his “serious impropriety” and “irreparable damage to the image of UC Davis” related to an agreement he executed with former University Relations Vice Chancellor Celeste Rose. The above linked article also said that Rose resigned from her post last June and began serving as a senior adviser to the chancellor, a two-year appointment at an annual salary of $205,000. </p>
<p>Could this type of stuff be part of the reason why tuition is skyrocketing at UCs and students are forced to live three to a room? Is UCD flooding the school with students to add needed revenue?</p>
<p>The interesting thing about the vote was that out of a total of 2,513 eligible votes, only 1,054 votes were cast and the final tally was 320 votes in favor of the no confidence measure and 734 votes against the no confidence measure. There were 1,459 people eligible to vote for the measure who abstained from voting. How bad do things have to get at UCD before the 1,459 people who abstained from voting decide to vote in a no confidence measure election?</p>
<p>Seems to me that this overcrowding problem is not exactly helping UC Davis’ image.</p>