IMO, Rankings are much, much more useful in finding new schools that you might not have heard of before, but are UTTERLY useless (at the undergraduate level,) when it comes to determining if the school you’re interested in is good or not.
Your “fit” with the school is much more important than what rank the school is, no matter what some on CC might say.
For example, I applied to college last-year for Public Health, which is not a typical major (like Bio or CS) that most colleges offer. In that sense, using ranking systems was beneficial because it allowed me to find colleges that offer the major, but it didn’t substitute for my own research on each college on my list.
Agree this is only useful in the sense of saying “hey, worth a look.” Harvey Mudd, Washington & Lee, West Point and Haverford - for example - are each going to appeal to ENTIRELY different kinds of students.
Though Niche’s numerical rankings appear to differentiate schools, note that the first 31 liberal arts colleges listed receive the same “Overall Niche Grade” of A+.
@TennisParent That’s might be true, but the fact is that rankings are EXTREMELY suspect to college manipulation, and the higher-up you go, the more the rankings are kind of random (is there truly a major difference between UChicago vs. Penn in the ranks etc.)
The Washington Monthly poll is also out. Pound for pound way more useful than the Niche survey and does a better job than the USNews in terms of real data and metrics regarding ROI:
Thanks @circuitrider ! That list utilizes a refreshing significant change in methodology and results, compared to the tired minimal shuffling of the usual suspects of other lists.
The definition of an LAC isn’t that it offers only, or primarily, liberal arts majors. If it were, Harvey Mudd wouldn’t fit that definition. An LAC, broadly speaking, is one that offers only, or primarily, undergraduate education.
One has to look at the number of students who are in liberal arts majors. The majority of Harvey Mudd students major in either CS or engineering (not considered as liberal arts majors), even though there’re more majors that are offered belong to liberal arts. BTW, the number of liberal arts majors offered almost always exceeds the number of non-liberal arts majors offered at nearly all colleges with only a few exceptions, because there’re simply many more majors in liberal arts.
Is Niche really used for ranking or advertising? We used it as an afterthought since the students sometimes revealed things about a university that maybe we haven’t heard before. But it never was used to make or break a school. Plus who cares. Rankings are for bragging rights so one can say “see my schools ranked top 300”… Lol… It’s just one piece to learn more about a school but this would have very low weight.
I think CS has been coopted as a liberal arts major over the years; it can be considered a branch of applied mathematics. And, while Mudd’s engineering program is ABET approved, it would still be in the “general engineering” category; Mudd offers a few electives in what would be separate engineering majors at a larger university.
I’d save my skepticism for the hundreds of LACs where the majority of students are business and accounting majors.
I took a big picture view of Niche when we were focusing on particular schools recently. I noticed that a few schools had more five star reviews than any other category ( with 1,000+ reviews) and to me, this told me that the students, overall, were very happy at their schools. Other great schools had fewer 5 star reviews, and more 3 and 4 star ones, and I believe this meant that – again overall – the students were slightly less happy there.