No More Loans @ Swat

<p>We just got this email:</p>

<p>December 12, 2007</p>

<p>To: Faculty, Staff and Students
From: Al Bloom, President</p>

<p>Re: Board Decision</p>

<p>I'm delighted to share the news that this past Saturday the Board of Managers made the decision to replace all loans with scholarships in student financial aid awards, effective the 2008-09 academic year, for both continuing and new students.</p>

<p>For many students the new policy will mean being able to chose Swarthmore and to engage fully their educational experience here free of debt. Moreover, an educational community marked by greater equality and opportunity empowers all students to become leaders in shaping a more just and generous world.</p>

<p>I'm proud that Swarthmore continues to build on its most deeply held values.</p>

<p>--
Maurice</p>

<p>I'm working on the Gazette story. We should have more information tonight.</p>

<p>This is on the Swarthmore web page today….</p>

<p>To further relieve the financial pressures facing students and their families, the Swarthmore College Board of Managers made the decision this weekend to replace all loans with scholarships in financial aid awards, effective the 2008-09 academic year, for both continuing and new students. </p>

<p>Read more Swarthmore</a> College | News | Swarthmore Eliminates Loans in Financial Aid Awards</p>

<p>This is a week of wonderful financial aid news!</p>

<p>It's about time.</p>

<p>Good Fin-aid is SUCH a big deal for me, and this is WONDERFUL.</p>

<p>And it eliminates my mother's last argument against Swat!</p>

<p>When I got this e-mail I almost cried from joy. Called both of my parents...</p>

<p>This is really going to ease the burden on so many of us...yay Swarthmore!</p>

<p>Thanks, Harvard! :)</p>

<p>Pomona's done this too.</p>

<p>does it include internationals?.. can anyone please confirm this?..</p>

<p>This affects all students. They wouldn't apply this just for domestic students! :)</p>

<p>Thanks a lot..</p>

<p>
[quote]
Thanks, Harvard!

[/quote]
</p>

<p>so true! once Harvard did it and it became public news, now everyone follows...Can't wait to see more schools doing this!</p>

<p>Harvard's plan is different. They actually lowered the EFC. I believe Princeton was the first school to go no loans, then Amherst, then Williams. This week Pomona and now Swarthmore.</p>

<p>seems no loans for internationals also
From the Daily Gazette:</p>

<p>College Goes No-Loans
By Miles Skorpen
10:44 pm - 12/12/07</p>

<p>When acceptance letters went out for the class of 2012 earlier this week, Swarthmore did not ask a single student to take on loans. And next year, one third of Swarthmore's population will receive much higher grants. Swarthmore has decided to do away with loans for students on financial aid.</p>

<p>"The decision was made this past weekend," said College Vice President Maurice Eldridge '61. "We didn't go into the meeting expecting to make the decision, but it just happened. We leapfrogged our planning."</p>

<p>It is a massive change to Swarthmore's financial aid program. Dropping all loans will cost the College roughly $1.7 million every year, which amounts to a 8.5% increase in financial aid spending. The College currently spends $20 million every year on financial aid.</p>

<p>The last change of similar magnitude was in 1998, according to Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid Jim Bock '90. It was then that the College made the Swarthmore Scholars program no-loan. This new decision is still unique in its sheer size. "There hasn't been another change that has affected this many people," said Bock.</p>

<p>The change will affect the 2/3 of the students receiving financial aid who currently receive loans—a total of nearly 500 students. On average, these students have loans of roughly $12,000 according to Bock.</p>

<p>"Our cap on loans is going from $15,000 to 0," said Bock with a big smile.</p>

<p>It is not clear why the Board decided 2007 was the year to make the change, but it was probably a combination of pressure from other peer schools–Davidson, Amherst, and Williams all have gone no-loan in the past year, and Harvard went no-loan on Monday–and a strong feeling among Board members that the change was simply the right thing to do.</p>

<p>"We've always been one of the leaders in how we give out need-based aid," explained Bock. Swarthmore will be the sixth college to have eliminated loans–Princeton was the first, followed by the four mentioned above.</p>

<p>Eldridge mirrored Bock's comments. "The Board was motivated by its principles, and the fact that Swarthmore has always tried to be really accessible," he said. "There is a perception that [Swarthmore] is impossible to afford or that debt is very scary."</p>

<p>The ongoing planning process helped set the stage for the change, as the College is still engaged in the Middle States Review process.</p>

<p>The next big question is how to raise the estimated $40 million required to endow this change in perpetuity. Eldridge thought it would be a challenge, but noted that financial aid is a relatively easy program to raise money for.</p>

<p>"Among all the things the college raises funds for, financial aid is the most popular, along with faculty chairs," he said.</p>

<p>After this monumental decision, where does Swarthmore go next? Bock is clear what his next target would be: "We aren't need blind for internationals." Still, he is heartened to know that the decision to go no-loan will have a big impact on current international students. "Few internationals are in the current group of no-loan students," he revealed.</p>

<p>Yep?the article I said I was writing.</p>

<p>Also, you really should just link to the article instead of copy-pasting all the text. At least include a link. Not that I really care, but more page views and more comments over at our site is always a good thing.</p>

<p>College</a> Goes No-Loans ? The Daily Gazette</p>

<p>arador, you wrote that?</p>

<p>
[quote]
Swarthmore did not ask a single student to take on loans

[/quote]
</p>

<p>isnt it to take out loans? lol</p>

<p>
[quote]
Bock is clear what his next target would be: "We aren't need blind for internationals."

[/quote]
</p>

<p>And also, why would they target internationals next? When they arent even done with the US students yet! They need to take out work study! No one does work study and that forces people to take out loans...</p>

<p><quote>Quote:
Bock is clear what his next target would be: "We aren't need blind for internationals."
And also, why would they target internationals next? When they arent even done with the US students yet! They need to take out work study! No one does work study and that forces people to take out loans...</quote></p>

<p>Actually, Swarthmore is need blind for American students. There is no movement towards removing work study, judging from my conversation with VP Eldridge. As I understand things, work study is rather minor at Swarthmore—up to a max of ...12 or 20 hours a week. Which is a lot, sure, but not more than many clubs or the like. </p>

<p>The fact that many internationals can't afford to come at all is a bigger issue.</p>

<p>
[quote]
No one does work study and that forces people to take out loans...

[/quote]
</p>

<p>That's completely untrue...plenty of us do our work-study component. It's a maximum of 7-8 hours per week, more if you want to earn more but the college only expects that much, max.</p>

<p>Yeah, when I was researching Swat it said about 80% of the students had a job on campus. So that sort of seconds Forgetmenots- tons do work-study.</p>

<p>Everyone of my daughter's friends does some kind of paid work study at Swarthmore, whether they are receiving financial aid or not.</p>

<p>Writing Associates
Library
Admissions tours</p>

<p>And, so on and so forth. I'm sure there are Swartmore students who don't have some kind of campus job, but that 80% figure sounds reasonable to me.</p>

<p>Even if it the work study figure is true, no one can deny that having it covered by grants is better.</p>