Nov 3 SAT - VERSION 2: Of SETIs, Cowboys, Cereal and Milk -.-

<p>dude i so agree with yu. I studied so much for reading and seemed okay until that section. All my studying will have gone to waste if i messed that section up.</p>

<p>But i dont think it was experimental, caus i had an extra math section. :(</p>

<p>YA the SETI thing.. im so mad
its not experimental .. i had a math exp.</p>

<p>Why did u guys put thoughtful prudence about the.. here kitty kitty thing?
i put unconditional trust?</p>

<p>Same ^....I did so great, just that section, holy ****, that's like 5 wrong.</p>

<p>Guys, what about that question about the texts with the cowboys, something like that:
The author of Passage 2 would view Passage 1 as:
a.historical tragedies
b.anti____ propaganda
c.realistic accounts</p>

<p>I was hesitating between b. and c., and put b. I don't know even why :(</p>

<p>i put nostalgic fantasy..</p>

<p>Did you guys come across any difficult W questions?</p>

<p>Yep, I thought about nostalgic at first, but then i realized that text 1 tries to demystify a common myth, so i guess that passage 2, which exalts the past, might disagree with it, but I don't know, that's why i'm asking. pls correct me if i'm wrong
and what did you answer on the next question about the relationship between the passages, i can't remember the answers but i do know that i was pretty uncertain</p>

<p>oh teh one im certain. It's about like the employees and employers</p>

<p>the vocabs werent that difficult right
there was one about ratifying a bill(?) or sth...was the answer repeal?... or was it endorse</p>

<p>I put endorse.
And nostalgic fantasy too..</p>

<p>Ahhh what did you guys put for the CONFORMITY OF thing. Is "of" wrong or is it supposed to be NO ERROR?</p>

<p>i think it was conformity to, not sure tho. Wat about improv paragraphs. The Q was like wat wud improve the passage overall. I put examples of how the girl's attitude changed. Any1 get same/diff? Also, the main idea of the SETI passage, i put describe an unusual undertaking. Wat did ppl get on that?</p>

<p>dangit. I put no error. I WAS thinking that it's wrong! But I only had one other no error so I just switched it. DAMN DAMN.</p>

<p>Yup I got the same as you for everything else:)</p>

<p>what about for writing?
touching his heart as well as others
touchign his heart as well as the heart of others?</p>

<p>etc?</p>

<p>tromsyo i think its nostalgic fantasy cuz passage 2 is def about how cowboys are just a myth(fantasy).. and how its like wanting the good old days back (nostalgia)</p>

<p>PSL i put the girls' attitude changed for the writing</p>

<p>but i got justifying an undertaking ( cant remember the wording) for the main point of the SETI... but this answer was a total stab in the dark lol.</p>

<p>Think I put the heart of others lol. Or sth like that. Cos if it's others..then you have to have an apostrophe!</p>

<p>Well, i'm obiously wrong about this nostalgic thing, as for the writing questions, yeah i think the hearts of others must be right, and the other one must be in conformity with(or to, i don't know, but def not of)</p>

<p>Hey,
does anyone remember about the sentence completion
that said something like endorse? becuz I don't remember anything
like that.. can someone give the sentence or other options?
Only thing that I could remember is the hampered-monitor
question.. does anyone remember this? </p>

<p>how many no errors did you guys get..? I only got 2.. and I feel bad</p>

<p>Besides that dumb conformity question, I only had one other no error! argh. Did your two include that? Don't tell me I missed another one. . . ):</p>

<p>i put no error on the sentence about kangaroos, do you guys remember smth about a professor and obvious mistake sentence
and would somebody tell me the last two questions about the texts with cowboys, one answer was like this: passage 1 interprets a myth while passage 2 uses it symbolically, i think i put this one,
and the other question what both passages do; i think i put something like lament for the past</p>