<p>Hold on. Didn’t J>K? I thought it was: “What is the least J so that the squares add up to 25” That would be -3, right? 9 + 16 = 25. So J,K is -3,-4.</p>
<p>Yes. The lowest value J could be was -3 while satisfying the condition J>K.</p>
<p>didn’t it have to do with the numbers 2 and 3, not 3 and 4(i forgot the order/negatives)?
I graphed it lol to check</p>
<p>I believe the answer choices were -5, -4, -3, 0, 1(not sure about this one)(dat pun)</p>
<p>j^2 + k^2 = 25, j>k</p>
<p>-3 is the answer.</p>
<p>yeah ok thanks</p>
<p>-2 and 3 (or vise versa) is a different problem, yes. It is correct, although i don’t remember the negative one either. It had some foiled polynomial.</p>
<p>-2 and 3 referred to the graph that had two zeroes, -2 and 3, and asked what their values were. (x-a)(x+b) or something</p>
<p>did you guys get a tuesday problem? it was like a guy wanted to work on tuesday, what was the chance that he worked on tuesday if sunday didn’t count?</p>
<p>was the non-experimental section the one that had a comparison error question about some writer(?) and a “pen and paper” (in the area with the 4 underlined words… somewhere near 26-29)? I had experimental writing and I can decide which was which still.</p>
<p>Either way, did the section you were talking about have a few comparison error questions or just one?</p>
<p>I distinctly remember that 1 of the sections had literally no comparison errors whereas the other one had a few (2-3)… anyone who did not have experimental writing for the behavioral studies test please reply!</p>
<p>Anyone else who had experimental writing, do you remember what was the editing paragraph about?..</p>