<p>Great test, fellas! Except for that y=x^2 and y=4 one.</p>
<p>All in all a wonderful test! Right?</p>
<p>no....</p>
<p>CR was harrd way too long</p>
<p>seriously. I agree w/ HopefulCEO
I thought math was harder than usual too. </p>
<p>Kiptok, unless you're being sarcastic, please keep quiet.
Thanks.</p>
<p>June 2008 SAT was great. Easier than I thought.</p>
<p>Was it harder than usual? This was my first time taking it in almost 3 years</p>
<p>Im not sure Im wrong on the y=x^2 and y=4 one (I put none), but HOW COULD THEY PUT THAT QUESTION ON A STANDARDIZED MATH TEST. It boiled down to an ambiguous vocabulary question (interpretation of interior). WTH </p>
<p>But, balancing that horrendous and inexcusable question, reading was on the easy side.</p>
<p>Seriously</p>
<p>Maybe they will just cancel it?</p>
<p>So, what was the answer to that??</p>
<p>I think it was none since the point could lie on (2,4) or anywhere on y=x^2 but I'm somewhat convinced about the II and III choice as well. It's the worst question ever.</p>
<p>The test wasn't too bad, I didn't think. I missed a couple, sure, but it was pretty alright.</p>
<p>It said the shaded area was INSIDE the y=x^2. Therefore it does not include (2,4). So it might be II and III.</p>
<p>I hated the y=x^2 question too..... I ended up saying none of them... I <em>think</em>.... :S</p>