<p>While I would support Hillary and possibly vote for her, I'm afraid that if she ran in 2008 she would lose. Her political stances over the years have polarized the republican-democratic parties.</p>
<p>I actually didn't really think of Bill, Jeopardy_Fan, which, now that I think of it, probably would increase her chances a lot. I'm still not sure if she can win though. But thanks for reminding me!</p>
<p>He's done plenty in my opinion (an Illinois resident). For example, he helped broaden the Democratic spectrum to inlcude evangelicals and he's helped raise the awareness of the situation in Darfur.</p>
<p>She has done a lot with Darfur and many other things and such, but lately she’s dropped from the senate scene as part of her strategy.</p>
<p>The right are notorious for defining their opposition which is a notorious strategy of Rove and B. Clinton has talked much of this (i.e. Kerry: flip flopper, democrats: not strong enough on Nat Security) And that is what the right has started to do with Hillary, so she has been not as present and thus not giving them a target. But when she reemerges she will reemerge with a new image. She will become very present after the Dems take back over the house and senate, I guarantee it.
...well that’s at least my theory.</p>
<p>ya, I saw him on meet the press this morning, he is so intelligent and well spoken; unlike our president. I can't wait for him to become our prez.</p>
<p>I think most people are attracted to him because of this ideas and his progressive nature.
He has also done a lot considering he has only been arond for two years.</p>
<p>I'd like to add something to my earlier statement. While it is ture that Obama has little to no experience governing, he could still be the President we need. Obama has shown a willingness to work with the other side, and could unite the country. That ability, along with his generally pragmatic policies could really heal and advance the nation.</p>
<p>^ I love that about him
I see him as being new as a good thing because he is fresh and not corrupt like many others, the Time article points that out.</p>