<p>the answer with employers was “rejected by employers”</p>
<p>The maps and projections of the planets’ surfaces were able to be instantly interpreted – “immediately understandable.”</p>
<p>Anyone remember iconoclastic vs ecletic?</p>
<p>the pictures were immediately understandable (from the geologist one).</p>
<p>eclectic i think. (i can’t remember what question this is)</p>
<p>Definitely eclectic. The novel could not be put in a specific genre, as it drew from so many various sources and was thus eclectic.</p>
<p>eclectic (did I spell it right?)</p>
<p>I got employers and eclectic.</p>
<p>^ does “immediately understable” refer to the Mercator maps?</p>
<p>i think i put dominant for that one, woops</p>
<p>@VARUNKG: yes</p>
<p>The maps were immediately understandable, yes.</p>
<p>artificially enhanced?? any1?..</p>
<p>for the face one? i forget what i put</p>
<p>I said mysteriously attractive/appealing for the face one.</p>
<p>It was definitely artificial. A couple of us argued for that a few hours back.</p>
<p>why werent the maps “mysteriously attractive”</p>
<p>i thought they were really interesting and super detailed</p>
<p>i put artificially enhanced…i think?</p>
<p>It was definitely immediately understandable; the author explicitly stated this in the passage (something like “immediately able to be interpreted”).</p>
<p>It was immediately understandable. for sure.
the justification was like in the same sentence… I don’t see how artificially enhanced would be even close</p>