<p>CAN ANYONE FIND THE PASSAGE ABOUT THE LOG AND THE DUDE GOIGN TO THERE</p>
<p>ha</p>
<p>There was a SC questions with the answer circumspect-erroneous</p>
<p>snoopi is correct. obviously it is not inevitable because they are choosing between two options: whether or not to do the action of P1. Inevitable means it is going to happen no matter what actions are taken. As well, the effects were clearly negative so why wouldnt they be undesirable?</p>
<p>It was undesirable. He offered a choice of the “default” path or the “design” path.</p>
<p>i got undesirable for the inevitable/undesirable one and I got antitode too for the log one.</p>
<p>One word gave “Inevitable” away.</p>
<p>For the last question on Keal, I believe the answer was Objective. I believe it was something to the effect of what the author was trying to say.</p>
<p>The passage talked about her style, and how the style was the substance. It wasn’t about Keal being unappreciated, but about people not considering her style?</p>
<p>The Trojan one wasn’t experimental; I had that sections, and my experimental was Math. I thought the one about the film critic was incredibly hard. I breezed through most of the CR until I got to the one about Keal, and then my mind just blanked.</p>
<p>Okay so I basically have two big questions:</p>
<ol>
<li>Diffident…aversion to OR Retiring…penchant for?</li>
<li>Archaeology or Homer? (I thought the point of the passage was to say that there WASN’T anything besides Homer to depend on…but I could be wrong)</li>
</ol>
<p>^ yea I put undesirable too because of “default”</p>
<p>i think I also put undesirable</p>
<p>In the last paragraph of the Kael passage, it clearly stated that there were critics. This supports “some disagreement”.</p>
<p>Definitely not inevitable. Else he wouldn’t argue for rewilding…</p>
<p>From someone who posted this link to Homer’s passage earlier:
[In</a> search of the Trojan War - Google Books](<a href=“In Search of the Trojan War - Michael Wood - Google Books”>In Search of the Trojan War - Michael Wood - Google Books)</p>
<p>Here’s my two cents on what Thucydides based his on. I believe it’s Homer because explicitly from the text:
“Out of Homer, Thucydides constructed a brilliant resume …on how the war might have come about… Thucydides THEN considers the increased knowledge of seafaring… the gradual construction of the wall.”</p>
<p>It’s clear that he bases his entire theses on Homer, and then uses the additional information from seafaring and walls (archaelogy) afterwards to further corroborate his theses.</p>
<p>Did anyone get “comparing style and substance” for the Kael/critics one for the question asking what the last paragraph’s main purpose was?</p>
<p>So about that question with the paragrapgh by thyludies or whatever? choices had like nation pride, weaker countries and stronger countries,</p>
<p>And third question: was one of the answers on Kael about how she related style with substance?</p>
<p>retiring …penchant for.</p>
<p>Questions!</p>
<p>1) why wasn’t the default plan “undesirable”? how come the answer is “inevitable”?
2) One question on Trojan passage. Why is it “paradox”- there were two answers I thought were close to answer.
First one- because people believed in an event that did not have written proof/ evidence
Second one- because the Father of Archaeology did not verify where the sources came from (something like that)
3) for the “ambitiou, wasteful, inadequate” question
I chose “ambitious” because in the first passage, the author says, “attempting to conserve ~~~ is a bold attempt”…
can you explain these?
thanks !</p>
<p>Wasn’t it “inevitable” because of the word "surely’'</p>
<p>Was the kael personal ancedote: Insight into her writing? or something?</p>