October 2010 - International SAT

Test Preparation SAT Preparation
121

<p>joshuakitty, wow, didnt really notice that… </p>

<p>@ what didn’t you notice?</p>

122

<p>that dust cleaner passage is bloody esay, too bad though :&lt;/p>

123

<p>I think I missed the published dates of the two articles in the preamble</p>

124

<p>=/ But it didn’t really thoroughly discuss the types of voters, so idk man.</p>

125

<p>okay, the 60-second interval between posts is killing me</p>

126

<p>^LOL…join the club…</p>

127

<p>ahahah me tooo!!! ;)</p>

128

<p>Guyssss do you remember what was supported by BOTH passages?</p>

129

<p>how do you guys know that 2nd section will be scored?</p>

130

<p>the author accounted views of the public, then go on to analyse the reasons behind the seemingly lack of personal voice, and then raised the point that there is no absolute personal political stand that all opinions are derivative… bla…bla…
Passage 1 sort of touched on types of voters a little bit, but it was the emphasis of neither passage</p>

131

<p>I’ve got a friend who had writing experimental, and didnt have the dust cleaner passage</p>

132

<p>what about the thing with the people at poles asking for peoples opinions. I said that i did not recognize that people responded as social beings…</p>

133

<p>that machines dont do a good job in translation or something along that line…</p>

134

<p>gregbob you are correct…</p>

<p>OK one question I am on the edge about…the ‘respondent’ one??</p>

<p>transitive hypothesis or not understandable or something were two options…</p>

135

<p>yea, i put that as well…</p>

136

<p>i put theoritical necessity… not sure about that one :&lt;/p>

137

<p>@joshua i think it was like scientists expectations were higher than reality, and another one said that scientists said that machine translations were readily achievable.</p>

<p>@major what respondant one???</p>

138

<p>I put cannot be completely comprehended (paraprashed)…Option B…</p>

139

<p>@GREGBOB: the second last question in the politics poll one… the statement ‘a man is an abstraction or something’ states what about the respondent:</p>

<p>a. theoretical necessity
b. Not completely understandable (paraprashed)
c. tentitive hypothesis…blah blah for the other two options…</p>

140

<p>gregbob, another one said that scientists said that machine translations were readily achievable.</p>

<p>Yeah I chose that one as well.</p>