<p>what was the nuclear one where it was between “it has been tried and requires more” or “the environmental risks are not justified”</p>
<p>also did the author focus on the black activist’s “personality” or “political philosophy”</p>
<p>@Indie500</p>
<p>Human characterisitic for walden,</p>
<p>Gains and Losses</p>
<p>It was “fundamentally human centered” or something of that nature, indie500.</p>
<p>It was view of history not politcal philosophy</p>
<p>Political philosophy. Positive.</p>
<p>agreed. Political Philosiphy. But does anyone know any of the other answers?</p>
<p>yeah im pretty sure it was political philosophy. what about the nuclear one, i put “its been tried” but it could have been the “environmental risks are not justified” one</p>
<p>That better have been political philosophy. </p>
<p>And what was the losses and gains question?</p>
<p>I second political philosophy. And the 2nd author’s response to the 1st author’s point about wind and hydro energy was really weirdly worded.</p>
<p>@grisam: something along the lines of “what do lines (x-y) demonstrate”. it was definitely losses and gains</p>
<p>guys did any of you have a CR experimental?</p>
<p>Yeah, but I put it’s been tried but needs wanting because it implied that it isn’t adequate to meet industrial needs, which is pretty much verbatim from the passage.</p>
<p>for the walden one appropriately scientific. the humanity thing it said in the last sentence that his lively question of youth was all but forgotten.</p>
<p>About the nuclear power plant thing: “it had been tried and found wanting.” eh??</p>
<p>also for the Fleece question did you guys put paranoid?</p>
<p>I dont think it was appropriately scientific one</p>
<p>@Subsidize
I put paranoid.</p>
<p>For nuclear one, was the author’s tone of engineers and scientists “weariness?”
Also on the same passage, what was passage 2 pointing out about passage 1? was it "it “undermines the costs” or something about “environmental damage”?</p>
<p>** sorry if this question is redundant…</p>
<p>I put It had been tried and found far from wanting</p>
<p>Fleece was paranoid. I put appropriately scientific for the first walden question, but I’m 99% sure it’s wrong T_T</p>
<p>I think it was “Human centered” and not appropriately scientific</p>
<p>@Subsidize–I put ‘ambivalent’. I’m pretty sure it wasn’t ‘paranoid’, because he was mocking to the narrator by saying “Oh you’re gonna hit me? Omg i’m soooo scared” or something like that. By process of elimination, I got ‘ambivalent’, which makes sense because he is both confident and scared.</p>