<p>Does anyone remember what the answer to the 2nd/ 3rd question…(not sure exactly, but it was at the beginning) was? It was a sentence that awkwardly connected two independent variable’s with “and”. I was down that and dividing it with a period.</p>
<p>^ I think I divided that with a period. I can’t remember exactly what it is but when I re-read it, it sounded good.</p>
<p>does the essay, if at all affect the writing score?</p>
<p>Two english scores are calculated. The first score is based on the multiple section only, and this is the score that affects the composite. The second score is the “english plus writing” score which factors in your essay score and gives you a different score for the english section. HOWEVER, this second “english plus writing” score has NO effect on your final composite score. So, in reality, the essay is a separate score and has no impact on your composite score.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the answer to the who/whom question? I am pretty sure it was who, but I am not certain.</p>
<p>it was who</p>
<ol>
<li>The first passage which listed a series of things. Should a colon have been there? I initially said yes but then second-guessed myself because a passage later used “such as” and didn’t have a colon after it.</li>
<li>Run-of-the-mill vs. fairly typical</li>
</ol>
<ol>
<li>“Really shining a light on” vs. “tried to focus on”</li>
</ol>
<p>^No, the words such as basically act as a colon.</p>
<p>If I remember right, the question with run of the mill and typical was which one was NOT a correct replacement? If so, those were both not the answer, and there was something in there that didn’t fit</p>
<p>Lacesea, it was: ,such as balls, sticks, etc. There seems to be an overall consensus on this. For #2, I said fairly typical because the other one just didn’t fit in. What do you guys think in regards to these two?</p>
<p>no colon, fairly typical (it wasn’t an EXCEPT problem), tried to focus on</p>
<p>It was not asking about which was NOT correct, but rather the other way around. I think it was fairly typical in terms of the text that surrounded the phrase. I also agree with you in regards to the colon thing.</p>
<p>^ That was the one about the museum. The answer is “fairly typical” because it describes how they show their artwork or something…</p>
<p>Are you sure it was who and not whom?</p>
<p>Oh. I probably got that right, still, I just don’t remember. And I think fairly typical sounds right.</p>
<p>The Who Vs. Whom question: Who is in terms of an action that a person/noun is a part of, whereas whom is a noun receiving a verb. The answer for this one would then be “who.” Were there any more tricky questions?</p>
<p>I think this was my worst English to date. I got a 35 last April. Whywhywhy did I do badly this time?!?!</p>
<p>It definitely was who.</p>
<p>Whom do you love? You love him.
Who is going to the store? He is.</p>
<p>Use the he or him trick every time. Him = whom, he = who.</p>
<p>What was the answer to the one about his age or whatever? It was the bicycle one, and there was one of them that didn’t fit. I was debating whether it was (Name of guy here), (number), or the other one which went something like (Name of guy here), then (number) to compete blah blah blah.
I chose the latter because it was missing a comma, but the first one I mentioned seemed really odd too. I’ve never seen someone just put a number in commas to represent someone’s age and not elaborate.</p>
<p>^You’re correct. You could say “John, thirtyseven, was blahblahblah,” I mean nobody ever says that normally, but I’ve seen it done before. On the other hand, the other one was like “John, then thirteen joined his first race” which is totally missing a comma.</p>