<p>Roman Numerals was all but except one I believe..</p>
<p>Alright. But I saw a post in which someone was certain it was all 3??</p>
<p>well i'm certain that it was only I and II</p>
<p>the question where it was like rst=30 and r^2t=200 what can't rs equal...i know the answer was 30 but was that experimental???</p>
<p>ya it was thank god. 3 questions i didnt know was on that section</p>
<p>wait also, i m not sure if this was experimental..but for a question that said how many triangles can you fit to make....was the asnwer 8?</p>
<p>What's another question from that RST experimental section, or what was the second to last question from that math experimental.</p>
<p>Ugh i remmeber some triangle problem. It had height of x, and base of x/4. Then i think it said howmany triangles do u need to make a square with side x. Is taht it?</p>
<p>Eh. I know the answer for the 'cylinder cone' question is 2, but can anyone remember the EXACT phrasing of the question?</p>
<p>I checked all the math sections MANY times, but I think i read the question wrongly on each time (I <em>may</em> have read the question as scooping the water out with the cone :S)</p>
<p>Thanks guys</p>
<p>electricool:</p>
<p>The first grid-in question was "If x/10 = 10, what is the value of 20/x?"</p>
<p>kevinscool - I didn't get that triangle problem you described in my paper.</p>
<p>However, if your question asks how many triangles you need, I assume it applies the area - in which case the answer is 4*2=8</p>
<p>
Cause i actually care about how well i did lol. Other times, there was nothing to talk about. then i have useless posts like these that add to my post count ^_^
How is excessive worrying about your scores NOW going to impact how did on the test last Saturday?</p>
<p>It will give him time to decide, for example, whether he should sign up for November SAT? (If it's even possible lol)</p>
<p>lol because it makes me confident in my CR score. There is a reason to be optimistic now</p>
<p>thanks spartyon.</p>
<p>I'm almost 100% sure the 'f(x)' question asked for the LEAST integer where (x+5)(x-8) would equal f(x)=0 rather than f(x)<0. </p>
<p>I'm also 100% the term 'LEAST' was in the problem and the 'unfoiled' quadratic equation was (x+5)(x-8).</p>
<p>I put down -5.
It can't be -4 because the equation would equal -12. If that were to be the case the answer should be -5.000000000000001:).</p>
<p>Joining in late.</p>
<p>^^Sorry, Penn_dreamer, the question was for f(x)<0.
f(x)= 0 would be too easy and without a catch.</p>
<p>-5<x<8, the least integer x=-4.</p>
<p>You guys, ignore my previous post. But still, just because a question is too easy and 'without a catch' doesn't mean it can't be a question.</p>
<p>I'm still standing by f(x)=0</p>
<p>It is f(x)<0.</p>
<p>yeah, it wasnt =0.</p>