<p>The answer is 2/15. It's not 2/5. 4/10x3/9 = 2/15</p>
<p>it's a. fall</p>
<p>Ok for science there were two barometers. Person 1 beleived gravity is the influence, person 2 believed the air pressure inside is the only influence. Anyone know which person would react to that "Barometer moved to a high altitude, so thus the the pressure is lower" so the stuff inside moves higher?</p>
<p>And also, did they collect the top portion of your ACT ticket after the test?</p>
<p>what about that one with the cone? 1/3(pi)(90)(10) something with 30 cubic centimeters?</p>
<p>was the triangle/trig one with the girl skiing? I think i got E. 19</p>
<p>the first passage in the english section-salon-the guy handed one instrument to one son, and another to his other son-how many commas were supposed to be in that sentence?</p>
<p>reading (birds & eggs) was the brick/mortar thing supposed to be brick wall?</p>
<p>Answer to the cone one is 3. Did they collect your ACT tickets?</p>
<p>yep, that's correct</p>
<p>idiomatically is there something wrong with "fall within"?</p>
<p>(... the alternative "fall into" seems more sound for this sentence)</p>
<p>yah</p>
<p>that's true.</p>
<p>father: I put scientist one</p>
<p>I put brick wall</p>
<p>what was the purpose of the last paragraph? to compare the strenght of other birds?</p>
<p>i think they both disagreed for the last question on the barometers ... b/c as altitude goes higher, pressure is lower, thus the height inside the barometer would then decrease ... both would conclude that if the volume of air/gravity were constant (which in this scenario it is) then the height has a positive relationship (linear... probably i would think) with the amount of pressure on it</p>
<p>Ya I got both scientists for that question to.</p>
<p>meh If only I had time I could have looked at all that..</p>
<p>Anyone get critical and insightful for how the unemployed people on the boat talked to each other? It was either that or Open and nice.</p>
<p>Also, did you get "Scholar" for the question about what navigators were?</p>
<h2>wait, there were two questions about both scientists. What was the answer to the first one and the second one? Did anyone write neither for any of them?</h2>
<h2>scientist was alright; it sort of caught me off guard.</h2>
<p>on the math what was the expanded equation to 3a^2 + something.</p>
<p>for the skiing i got 27. you use law of cosines. that one side was 13.8 i think. 6+8+13.8=27.8. 27 was the closest one i think</p>
<p>hey and i got 0 commas for that so in no time
b/c the first clause is an independent with a comma after it
so we are left with another clause, however, in no time i jumped off the seat is an independent clause</p>
<p>i think i narrowed it down to two:
b. so, in no time
d. so in no time</p>
<p>ultimately i went with D b/c in B you have two independent clauses with no connector, separated by a comma - grammatical fallacy</p>
<p>I got scholars, but i got awkward and reserved for the way they talked to each other.</p>
<p>i got scholar for "navigation of thought." what a sweet name</p>
<p>Ya I got 27.</p>
<p>yeah, it was scholars.</p>