<p>For me, the science was going very well, until I was pressed for time for the conflicting scientists. I had to make complete guesses for three of them. Other than that, I may have missed one or two more throughout the rest of the test.
Any curve predictions?</p>
<p>Science took me way longer than usual! I’m hoping that -3 will still be a 34…I know I got at least that many wrong.</p>
<p>@Hville7 I’m hoping the same because I know I got about 3-5 wrong, and I really want a 30+ in the science.</p>
<p>Not that challenging except for the scientists. But the time was brutal for me. I had to rush for the last 15-18 questions so I have no idea how accurate I was on those.</p>
<p>I know I got at least 1 wrong in the rats section, and I don’t think I did well on the fluids section…hopefully only missed 4 though. One of the practice tests in the Real ACT Study Guide (previously administered) has a science curve of 36/40 → 34. So I’m hoping for that but it seems like a long shot.</p>
<p>What was the answer to the last question? I’m pretty sure it was the last Science question about Figure 1. I don’t remember the wording but I put 2 pi R I’m pretty sure.</p>
<p>It was pi r i think becuz it was just a semi circle</p>
<p>Do you guys remember the ion source electricity one? What was the answer to the one with magnitude of velocity and direction of velocity? It was a little chart. I had from source to hole it was magnitude and hole to metal it was direction bc it had centrifugal force. I had no clue lol</p>
<p>I chose magnitude for both. I have no idea.</p>
<p>Omg, science, reading, and math were all brutal. I’ve had a 4.0+ all throughout high school (I’m a senior, but taking a gap year), and I spend all my time studying, so I naturally aligned myself with my friends who make the same grades as me. They seem to have high scores (29-34), but after taking this test (my first time), I am so afraid that I’m going to end up at my state university. NOOOOO! </p>
<p>Quick question: Who actually reads the science passages/introductions? I was told not to, and it seemed to help with the data representation, but on some of the other science portions, it just seems to have hurt me.</p>
<p>@jdan123 it was magnitude from source to hole, then direction after that because it was centripetal acceleration.</p>
<p>On passage 7, the top right question asked about direct and indirect. Was the answer F? (or A?) I think it was just V direct and Q and B were indirect???</p>
<p>I can’t exactly remember but it was either A or B (E/F)</p>
<p>There was another question where I answer that I think trial 7 with a B value of .12? would have to be greater than .07.</p>
<p>I chose magnitude for the first and then direction for the second because the ion was speeding up as it when through the hole, but only changed directions (went in a semicircle) after passing through the hole. The intro paragraph said that the magnitude of V after passing through the hold was equal to V after the ion was measured at the end of the semicircle.</p>
<p>@doctorknow96 I think that one of the tables showed that increasing B → decreasing R, so I put less than .07 i think…</p>
<p>in the cola intake for the women and the rats, the last question asked about whether solid food (or something, i forgot) affected either the women, the rats, both or neither. which one was it?</p>
<p>What is a possible raw score for a -6 on the science section (Normally i get a 34 and today was like out of control)???
Thanks to those who answer</p>
<p>@tiger, I believe it affected neither.</p>
<p>@tigerash
It only affected the women. The rats were fed a controlled diet, but not the women.</p>