<p>That is correct. Besides, a moving river is subject to super cooling, as the motion could break apart the ice crystals forming.</p>
<p>Yeah efeens. @RayeDrum: the question was asking which stream would be LESS likely to freeze first at the top. Therefore the moving stream (Stream A) was the answer.</p>
<p>Ah, okay. I can’t freaking wait until april 29th haha</p>
<p>hey guys, for the insulating question, what was the wording of the ans? i remember putting “greater than 8 but less than 14” or something like that…</p>
<p>Hey guys. For the rat one, can we come to an agreement that study one would be affected by the statement. The question I have is that if nothing is mentioned about the women study, does that make it neither or further prove the fact study 1 is the answer</p>
<p>I’d say it further proves that study 1 is the answer, because if they didn’t explicitly say that the amount of food each woman ate was controlled, then it’s a lurking variable and definitely could have had an impact on the study outcome. (Stats ftw!)</p>
<p>Was the statement about quantity of food? Or type of food?</p>
<p>It just said their food intake, so both could be implied. Therefore, it would affect Study 1 because controlling variables such as diet is basic in an experimental design.</p>