<p>Oh, that one was definetly the lazy workers. Entrepenuers are the ppl doing the manipulating, not the ppl being manipulated.</p>
<p>It's just simple grammar that's all...</p>
<p>Khalid,</p>
<p>I think there is some confusion over which question is being analyzed. Since I do not remember either questions, verbatim, I cannot give a definitive answer as to what I think is right.</p>
<p>Is there anyone here who could compile a list of the questions and answers...so we can cut down on the repetition? I wish I could but I am very poor with computer skills.</p>
<p>Another question was what is the meaning of conventions
that was the first question in the native american one I believe.</p>
<p>Anniem,</p>
<p>I put "established rules," or something of that sort.</p>
<p>I think I did also if you can remember the choices Ill know for sure.</p>
<p>Thus far, my memory has eluded me in my attempt to recall the peculiarities of yesterday's test. </p>
<p>I think it is best that we just wait until February 8th, and not agonize ourselves with this!</p>
<p>amen nspeds. I unofficially declare this thread a ceased discussion.</p>
<p>I remember thinking of choosing the word columny as an answer, but I think I chose another better one. Anyone remember the question?</p>
<p>Ahem. I UNOFFICIALLY declare this thread a ceased discussion. We're all dying of stress here. Woops, said the loud part soft and the soft part loud.</p>
<p>One aspect that did cause a great deal of anxiety during the next was the alphabetic pattern of the answers. For example, in the first verbal section I leaped from A to E repeatedly; on the last section, or second to last, I went from C to B three times in a row (ie. CBCBCB). I know such patterns have no bearing on their validity, but did it not strike you as odd? </p>
<p>And am I the only one who is currently having nightmares of the possiblity that I might have bubbled in the wrong bubbles by mistake. I caught myself doing that during the test, though I subsequently corrected it. But I am still unsure of myself.</p>
<p>if possible, can anyone clearly remember the wording of the "traitor" question to the native american passage?</p>
<p>I think the questions are relevant for someone trying to decide whether to cancel the test.. for fear it'll fall below his or her previous scores.</p>
<p>umm. I just filled in the bubbles right after solving the question so I don't remember the bubble patterns. actually after the first verbal (with the native american) I was planning to cancel, but just went on for teh sake of it. now i have to decide (in a matter of hours) whether to cancel this test or not.</p>
<p>
[QUOTE]
I think the questions are relevant for someone trying to decide whether to cancel the test.. for fear it'll fall below his or her previous scores.
[/QUOTE]
</p>
<p>I would love to answer you, but I really cannot recall the answer or information!</p>
<p>i seriously think that it's entrepreneurs instead of lazy workers.. 1 it doesn't make sense cos it's not just the lazy ones that get exploited according to the passage... 2 man if i read that question wrong also i really did fu** up on this test!(maybe I really did............:( ) but please i already made a mistake on missing out on the "other" on the "other skater" question..I thought compulsive did not quite fit the sencom sentence (so i put like that the scientist was "assiduous" or somethin :( ) tell me that it's enterpreneurs plz!! kkkkkkkkkkkk</p>
<p>What's the question to enterpreneurs and lazy workers?</p>
<p>I think I put entrepeneurs.</p>
<p>I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but "compulsive" was the correct answer for the scientists question.</p>
<p>Entrepreneurs...that sounds familiar. Is that the answer to the question on the double reading passages that asked what the "others" from passage 2 was most similar to on passage 1?</p>
<p>Assiduous would actually make more sense than compulsive, I think. But assiduous wasn't one of the choices.</p>
<p>For the meaning of conventions, I put "common practices" or something of that sort. That's how we defined literary conventions in the various literary theory books I skimmed through. There's a fine line between convention and usage rules.</p>