<p>For 4 on passage two, I think it was an exception question. Which did not contribute to the controversy of him making a mural for Dartmouth.
The ones that did contribute were the controversial social commentary, he was being paid a lot during hard times, and he was a foreigner. So it was the one that wasn’t those. xD</p>
<p>6 on passage four was the airplane question -> it was an embarrassing mistake; amateur mistake.
5 on passage four -> transient phenomena</p>
<ol>
<li>question dealing with protest in Dawsworth: harsh or vulgar content on murals </li>
</ol>
<p>Wasn’t one of the choices regarding the artist making disparaging remarks? I don’t recall ever seeing anything about the artist , so why isn’t this the answer?</p>
<p>also for clarity’s sake 6 on passage 2 had to deal with the import of Chinese roses, not their increase in growth. the answer dealing with technology had to do with that I believe</p>
<p>Thanx blackcat, also I think you are right there was no vulgar as the question. But commentary was not the answer, it was the answer that had “comment” in it i believe</p>
<p>Ok let’s make a consolidated list:
Lets start with passage 1:
usually wakes up in the morning
picks up junk early-mid morning
why he felt surprisingly okay
the customer thought he was negotiating, he had no intention to
ignorance
brains to attics
applied the notion faithfully, dealing with the last paragraph
thought the radio was worth alot, rare prototype
felt happy to sell it, connected to childhood
10.</p>
<p>applied the notion faithfully, as in the wordworths one? and what is this thought the radio was worth a lot one? was it like he had hoped that he didnt jsut sell off a rare prototype, what was the question and what were the answer choiceS?
Passage 2:
loosely chronological
dry shrubs or something like that
petals
300 A.D.
political import: meaning
revolution: increase growth in roses in China, proliferation
question referring to people who used roses in the future: I put the people of the same era was NOT it: don’t remember exactly.
16th century question:
10.</p>
<p>Revolution in China…I don’t remember if that was the answer. I remember the question asking for what it meant for the passage to use the word revolution. I think it was something about a lot of varieties coming into existence because of crossing between different types as they were introduced into different regions. The last sentence of the paragraph with the word revolution explicitly talked about “yellow and (insert color) roses combinations, etc.” I don’t know if it had anything to do with china, may have. All the rest of the choices were specific historical events that you might find in a history book, they didn’t make that much sense.</p>
<p>For the people who would use the roses in the future. I put the residents of crete because the article talked about how the descendants of those people also used it later or something. Crete was the island of the Minoans. I actually dont remember the problem in fully and sort of feel like it was actually “EXCEPT” question and that I picked the one that didn’t make sense (even though i picked residents of crete first). anyone remember the question/choices?</p>
<p>Passage three:
dealing with main theme
consensus or debate between decried and not putting on murals??
mesmerizing and dynamic
question dealing with protest in Dawsworth: harsh or vulgar content on murals or something like that. This was the answer NOT for the controversy
rythmic orchestration
U.S. public art
Culmination to Mexico of his career from U.S.
similar to NYC
10.</p>
<p>main theme was NOT a comparison of his time in mexico to his time in USA. the first paragraph mentions mexico, then the last paragraph briefly mentions it. rather, it was a closer look at his time spent in USA. IMO.</p>
<p>this might be number 4 but I remember one of the options being that that Darthmouth art department like didn’t support the artist but they did. it was an all except question. the other choices were like the depiction, the fact that he was a foreigner, and that it was a financially hard time. the answer that made sense mentioned the art faculty. </p>
<p>Passage 4:
Clementine preceded first
what was the main theme of the passage: I said it was general then further explained throughout the essay.
blue color: surface age of the crater
Briotti thought Stuart was conservative
the crater caused the huge ball of dust or enamation of dust something of that nature
the second paragraph showed there was dispute among scientists.
<p>Yes. The Crete one was an exception question, I also picked the one that didn’t make sense. But the commentary choice was not the answer, I think disparaging remarks was the right one. I also agree that the revolution brought about new varieties of roses. And yes, it was more focused on his ventures in the US.</p>
<p>But the content of his murals was social commentary, which they were protesting against. I’m pretty sure the answer was disparaging remarks about the art faculty.</p>
<p>Ejecta blanket was material thrown out due to impact, at least for me. Also agree with the exception answer of disparaging commentary on art faculty.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember whether clementine was A or B? I think I changed my answer to B and I’m worried because I think that that was the colleague answer.</p>
<p>if orozco made disparaging remarks about the faculty, that fact wouldn’t make sense considering the faculty actually pushed for his contract on behalf of orozco. if he talked about dartmouth faculty behind their backs, there certainly would have been great discussion about it in the passage.</p>
<p>btw phew! Glad I changed it to the correct answer then.</p>