<p>what is going on?</p>
<p>i didn't get the Kasparov/computer networks passage.</p>
<p>are the intellectual sport/hackneyed questions just one question?</p>
<p>If so, i'm almost positive its hackneyed and repetetive.</p>
<p>No, they're different questions.
But, I did get the same answers to those 2 questions though.</p>
<p>was dirge correct in the sentence completion ?</p>
<p>i think that section may have been experimental</p>
<p>^ yes it was dirge.</p>
<p>-Yeah I put intellectual sport because he used words like "serve" and "hurled" conservative slogans.
-i put hackneyed and repetitive
-i put author brought up both sides to show debate was an exchange of platitudes
- for the one about the episode, I put partisan debate. Cuz the text was like " What politics lacked was shown by an episode which it was not lacking" It wasn't lacking in partisan debate although i thought that question was very confusing
What was the answer to the "outfit" question? THis was a vocab-in text question</p>
<p>ein do you think that section was experimental?</p>
<p>what pssages accomanied that section?</p>
<p>wht about elan, technique?</p>
<p>I may have put exchange of platitudes... i don't remember.</p>
<p>I'm not sure if I put partisan debate either. I think I did...</p>
<p>I suck at remembering. I couldn't even remember my essay topic like 10 minutes after we got out. lol</p>
<p>-Yeah I put intellectual sport because he used words like "serve" and "hurled" conservative slogans.
-i put hackneyed and repetitive
-i put author brought up both sides to show debate was an exchange of platitudes
- for the one about the episode, I put partisan debate. Cuz the text was like " What politics lacked was shown by an episode which it was not lacking" It wasn't lacking in partisan debate although i thought that question was very confusing</p>
<h2>What was the answer to the "outfit" question? THis was a vocab-in text question</h2>
<p>Are all these right?</p>
<p>For outfit one I think I put vehicle..</p>
<p>Nicole, they say here that whatever section had the Alaska passage was experimental (which is a pity because I did well on it). Elan/technique is correct.</p>
<p>I got the same things as Gaia. But, I wasn't so sure about the partisan debate one... I got something else =[</p>
<p>alaska/new hampshire was experimental... damn!</p>
<p>so that mens the shaw/shakespeare wasnt?</p>
<p>when is this posted on cc?</p>
<p>I remember the vehicle one... yes I put vehicle too...</p>
<p>Yeah I put vehicle also.
What about the "episode" question...what did "episode" underscore?</p>
<p>Lobster Passage:
What was the attitude of the author towards the "new scientists"? Was it considerate or admiring? </p>
<p>Paired passage on Decline in Literature:
What was the tone of the 1st paragraph of both passages?</p>
<p>I don't think it was a partisan debate..
I put human engagement.. The "episode" was explained later in the passage (about this politician thinking about his grandson bla bla bla)</p>
<p>For the lobster one I put admiring... it used words that implied admiration, or so I thought.</p>
<p>I don't really remember the others ones though... If u can remember some choices maybe I could remember my answer??</p>
<p>Ah yes!</p>
<p>I did put human engagement for that one...</p>
<p>Originally i think i had partisan debate and changed it to human engagement...</p>
<p>The episode underscored a time when someone transcended above political ideological beliefs. </p>
<p>He was admiring of the new scientists because it said they did "inordinate amounts of work" to get the job done, all in attempt to try to prove that lobsters were not declining.</p>
<p>The tone question was somber vs. wry.</p>
<p>Yes it was vehicle, even though I've never heard anyone call a vehicle an outfit, it's implied that he's talking about a car.</p>
<p>great!
Hey what did you put for the planet one..
The colleague remarked "celebratory" or "amused"</p>
<p>I mean it could go either way, but I put celebratory</p>
<p>Yes, I put somber vs wry also.</p>
<p>That rings a bell.</p>