<p>Cheesecakke,</p>
<p>Since it said electrical resistance was directly related to circuit length, I put</p>
<p>it decreases because circuit length decreses as it’s being propelled/projected.</p>
<p>@voberator: I was iffy too! I think I said the one about the past and present</p>
<p>@faux, I also put b, since it said carter was adlibbing earlier.</p>
<p>Which is NOT revealed about carter? I said whether or not he also has been a straight man before
- same</p>
<p>it" in line 2 refers to what?
- I put his partnership with Carter</p>
<p>but this what not the case" refers to the narrator getting less than half the salary
- what I put</p>
<p>faux,</p>
<p>1) Yes, I put made up on the spot.
2) Yes, whether or not he also has been a straight man.
3) it referred to the narrator’s upcoming act, I think.
4) Yes, half the salary</p>
<p>faux, i put that too, where it connects to her past life experience to present. i dont know if its right though</p>
<p>3) woops, I meant the partnership with carter</p>
<p>OH! on natural science,
the relationship between ___pods and saltbushes</p>
<p>Was that all ____pods are saltbushes?</p>
<p>Iris, I think it was saltbushes are one example of pods.</p>
<p>Awww :(.</p>
<p>The sad part is that I put that first and then changed it to this.</p>
<p>I changed it after reading “____pods, or saltbushes, blah blah”</p>
<p>so I was like: “!!!”</p>
<p>and then scribble.</p>
<p>Oh on “half the salary” I put getting to say all the punch lines or something, I didn’t think he meant his salary?</p>
<p>no saltbush is a type of chenopod</p>
<p>@cheesecakke,</p>
<p>I’m not sure if this is correct, but I remember him talking about distributing the money 40:60 right before the “it” sentence</p>
<p>faux, I put that too. Connecting her past experiences with her present. I’m pretty sure that’s right because there was something in the concluding paragraph about a “vine intertwining her past and present”</p>
<p>Oh, on the english section:</p>
<p>The parody passage:</p>
<p>“He should’ve ended it there, but he went on using long, blah blah blah”</p>
<p>That was untangle, wasn’t it?
(I was looking for a synonym of understand, but then I changed it to that because it said that it has to match the previous writing stuff-thing)</p>
<p>@Iris Oh okay, that makes sense.</p>
<p>And on the government one, what did you guys say for how the author responded to the paragraph with all the questions?</p>
<p>Iris, </p>
<p>Yea I put untangled. </p>
<p>Cheesecakke, </p>
<p>I said that he answered some of them using specific examples</p>
<p>Oh, I put he used various illustrations to answer several/some of the questions</p>
<p>Cheese,
I said he answered some of the questions with specific illustrations. Pretty sure that’s right.</p>
<p>Iris,</p>
<p>Thats what I meant, I couldn’t exactly remember the wording.</p>
<p>Yea, choice A said: ------------ answering all questions in chronological order
B just said several, so I chose B.</p>
<p>But I might be wrong</p>