***Official February 2015 SAT Makeup (US ONLY) THREAD***

it says the 12th because it shows up on collegeboard website as the Jan test, which gets released on the 12th, but there is no way that they can mail the tests to their graders and have all the tests graded by thursday

if u think about it, its really only the northeast that took make up

True, but A: That’s thousands of essays that need grading and B: There are a lot of formalities involved in the process

Does anyone if the curve for january was lenient?

Also, dont’ forget some are deferred to Fe 14 or 21 to make up. Those have not taken the test by the 12th.

probably because it was hard from what i heard

@alpha525‌ If that is the case, then that would be advantageous for us.
I honestly thought that the test wasn’t bad.

this test was definitely easier than the real january test

@top586

@love2cheeses who’s deferred to feb 14 or 21?! theres no way

omg there are people taking it feb 21st. there no way its the same test either

@alpha525‌ I am taking the test Feb 21st.

@alpha525 here you are http://sat.collegeboard.org/register/sat-test-center-closings

alright u guys wanna get back to going over answers? this is a small thread, usually sat threats are 120 pages+

I agree

What did you say for why the author of the philosophy passage used aristotle and seneca in the first paragraph? I said two relate the two, but this website - http://www.examdude.com/2011-march-sat-critical-reading-questions-and-answers/ says otherwise

did you guys say symbolism or coherance? for the rug one

@9penn9‌ i said the same thing that guy put up. he was saying a viewpoint

Who remembers other answer choices to the movie dual passage where it was, what would author 2 say about author 1’s claims?

I only know one was about specificity, what were the others?

@2400ismygoal1‌ I said coherence, they were talking about how the rug had to be part of a whole and unified
I realize he was saying a viewpoint in the philosophy one, but where did he later qualify it? Also, did you say invective against poor craftsmanship? I did not.