***Official February 2015 SAT Makeup (US ONLY) THREAD***

@9penn9‌ idk why

@redrabbit23‌ wow theres a lot of the same questions…

thats actually really surprising I never would have thought they’d reuse questions :confused:

looks like I might have to read through a few of these threads before my next SAT :wink:

What did you guys say for the philosophy one where: why did the author use Seneca and Aristotle? I said relating methods because they had similar ideologies

Yeah, I believe CB has been reusing old tests in their efforts to concentrate on the new test coming out.

can anyone estimate my score:
Cr: 3-4 wrong
Math: 3 omitted 1 wrong
Writing: 3 wrong, 9-11 essay
rough range is fine

was the p* question the 2nd or 3rd section?

for the short passage about horror movies did you get reaction to audiences for the last one or the emotion (?) one? i had reaction to audiences

what’d you guys get for the hip hop passage questions

@Shagun98‌ emotions I think, reactions of the audience was an answer to another question wasnt it? one of us is mixing them up haha

for the first one on those passages did you get “coping mechanisms”?

i think the choice ur thinking of was eliciting an emotional response and then for another question i think the other choice which i didnt put was emotional stability

anyone remember any more math questions?

@aprilmayjune3‌ yes eliciting an emotional response I chose that one

I said audience reactions

did you guys get that results were based off simple calcualations
purpose was economic analysis
flawed methology
-the passage about working conditions

anyone get 2010 for one of the math grid in’s?

This was my first SAT, never taken any practice tests before either, and I didnt think it was that hard.

Can anyone who has taken multiple tests comment on if this was a hard one in comparison to others or not?

was it essence or disposition for the philosophy/ purpose of reading passage

@sonpat yep

I got 2010 as well
Did anyone get 3 for one of the grid ins?

@top586‌ I put “without taking into account bigger economical ideas” or something like that