<p>I think one example is fine if it is fuly developed. I used only Mozart and filled up every last blank with good writing if i do say so myself.</p>
<p>k+p+s is the answer</p>
<p>I also had writing as experimental and didn't get the harrowing and ingenuous answer choices</p>
<p>@gcards1</p>
<p>it was the two angles inside the triangles plus the other angle that was congruent to the remaining angle inside the triangle (parallel line angle rules)</p>
<p>k i think I got that correct, thanx.</p>
<p>
[quote]
for the people who got "harrowing" and "disingenuous" as answers for the sentence completions....did u have 4 Critical Reading Sections???
...I got an experimental section for writing, and I did not get "harrowing" or "disingenous" as answers
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I had a writing experimental and I also did not get those answers, so yeah I think you're probably correct.</p>
<p>For writing there were 2 I wasnt sure of..</p>
<p>something about: The climbers tapping their energy supplies. I put E, but I wasnt sure if it was A or not cause it could be tapping into.</p>
<p>and also the one with : ...mistrust with</p>
<p>The climbers' one I had E, but then I switched to D (i think), "what was beginning" - just didn't seem specific enough.</p>
<p>I think I put mistrust with was wrong. Just sounded weird.</p>
<p>Oh, escuis, I totally forgot about those 2 Qs. But I put the same answers as you : E (climbers) and mistrust with...however, I was also unsure for the same reasons. =/</p>
<p>Did anyone have a writing section about "students debate with" and about the mayor appointing heads of his cabinet or something? I'm pretty sure that was the experimental...</p>
<p>lol. it wasn't climbers...it was team members. i put E (because what was beginning was right)</p>
<p>and yes mistrust with is wrong</p>
<p>Truthsmoker, I don't remember those Qs. The only mention of a mayor in the writing section for me was one where u had to correct the entire sentence.</p>
<p>i thought the whole start of that sentance didnt make any sense...but maybe thats just me</p>
<p>Tapping... Tapping into.. hmmm tapping is like tapping into phone calls, but is that the same as tapping INTO supplies?</p>
<p>
[quote]
Truthsmoker, I don't remember those Qs. The only mention of a mayor in the writing section for me was one where u had to correct the entire sentence.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>All right, then it's probably the experimental. The one about students debating involved student fees or something that they thought were too high. That's the only one I remember vividly.</p>
<p>@Truthsmoker</p>
<p>yup experimental...didn't get that section</p>
<p>lol i didn't even have enough time to write 1 and a half pages</p>
<p>"Tapping... Tapping into.. hmmm tapping is like tapping into phone calls, but is that the same as tapping INTO supplies?"</p>
<p>i put E for that one</p>
<p>On my essay, I had an intro, 3 supporting paragraphs (2 examples, first example was 2 paragraphs long) and a conclusion. The conclusion did not end as I wanted it to, because timew as called. It ended like "x and y are two examples of discoveries that were made etc" How much (if at all) will that hurt my score...if it was well-written overall, could I still be looking at a 10-12?</p>
<p>oops i mean</p>
<p>*tapping phone calls</p>