<p>What do you guys think ~10 Omit -2 with this curve would be?</p>
<p>Also one of them was as x gets infinitely larger, the limit was y = 750, right?</p>
<p>@thesoxpride10 I followed that logic at last and chose 64 but what bothers me is the wording of the question. Do you remember how it asked “the number which could be expressed by the product of two DISTINCT prime numbers” and which then has the highest power. Taking distinct into account 64=2*6 but its only the product of one prime 6 times, whereas 100 is that of two primes</p>
<p>@Audrae there were three graphs to pick from that crossed (or “kissed”) the x axis three times. One of them had a zero with a multiplicity of 2 meaning it was a quartic, and another one was a cubic with one zero that had a multiplicity of 2. So the right answer the one with 3 clean crosses and mimicked the cubic function. </p>
<p>It said that every number greater than 1 can be expressed in only one way as a product of distinct primes, not including 1 as a prime (basically telling you that you can find the prime factorization of every number greater than 1). Then it asked, if you were to find the prime factorization of the following numbers, which of these would have a prime with the highest power</p>
<p>WHO HERE HATES THE COLLEGEBOARD?</p>
<p>LEL</p>
<p>@NPenn24 Yeah it was 750 mang</p>
<p>ahhh 18 more days</p>
<p>@College123college I’m so nervous…I feel like I didn’t do as well as I could have 
</p>
<p>New doc, don’t f it up please
<a href=“June 2014 SAT Subject Test Math Level II - Google Docs”>June 2014 SAT Subject Test Math Level II - Google Docs;
<p>EVERYONE,</p>
<p>Fill out the survey for collegeboard. On the last question, under feedback, write about the great circle question, vague wording, etc. I’m pretty upset over this, so that’s what I did. I feel that we need to tell them about this, since the test was a huge shocker compared to even Barron’s. The cutoff for 800 better be -10 or more. </p>
<p>Been through Calc BC and Stats, crammed two nights before
Was a lot easier than I expected, though… omitted 4-6, felt decent about all but 2 of the ones I answered. Math I was glorious though </p>
<p>Vague wording… yeah, that was a major problem. @97percent, can you post a link to the College Board survey? I can’t seem to find it… -___-</p>
<p>Yeah i cant find it either</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure it’s through email.</p>
<p>I didn’t get anything through email.</p>
<p>@97Percent sorry, your awful reading skills doesn’t give college board a reason to lower the scale ;)…</p>
<p>Most everybody else read the questions fine, don’t blame collegeboard for YOUR LACK OF UNDERSTANDING…</p>
<p>Also the curve has NEVER been -10 before. It probably has never even been -9 before… Sorry to crush your dreams, but they’re just unrealistic.</p>
<p>You have to admit, some of the questions were sketchy. I mean, you could understand them, but it wasn’t easy.</p>
<p>And it’s been -9 before. </p>
<p>I’ll admit this test was definitely hard, but I’m pretty confident in very lenient curve. </p>
<p>Although realistically, this one’s probably going to be 6-8 ish.</p>