<p>was the thing with keep all the animals
to ridicule him or make a change</p>
<p>it was definitely to make a change</p>
<p>and i think its overwrought</p>
<p>rob frost q's</p>
<p>wat were some of the rob frost q's</p>
<p>examples of rob frost q's w/ answers</p>
<p>Two questions:
1. Was the author confirming his suspicion about Frost's genuine character
2. Why did the lady say,"dont you know that plants eat stones"</p>
<p>For the latter, i thought it was the choice with naive</p>
<ol>
<li>yes</li>
<li>.. what?</li>
</ol>
<p>wat else was there besides naive</p>
<p>Oh, and the herd one was the negative thing.... i take AP psyche, and groupthink is a negative term. it refers to the tendancy of people to become even more extremist when interacting in a group. Groupthink is blamed for the NASA disaster and the KKK. It is a negative word</p>
<p>For the stones question, I think I put like
"a new way to introduce a scientific..."blahblah
because for the naive one, it said that the SPEAKER was trying to sound naive, which I dont think she was doing?
I dont know, that was a tough one.</p>
<p>Um, not sure. There was some compelling evidence that it was naive and it kind of sounded like one of their answers. Also, what was the thing about the guys book. It was like too florid, so i said that he needed to make it diffused. The other choice i narrowed it down to was dissaffected, which i later learned is not to be confused with unaffected, which would fit the sentence. Diffused means to be made less brilliant or softened.</p>
<p>thanks grahams, they were all just saying confirmed and nothing about suspicion. i thought i overlooked that as an answer choice.</p>
<p>it was to introduce a scientific....
not naive.
wat were some of the rob frost q's
wat was the diffused one
sentence completion admired and declined?</p>
<p>what was like the hardest rob frost q's and answers
do u remmbber any?</p>
<p>no, it wasnt to do that. that is not deep enough. I think she was saying that in a naive manner because she kind of assumed that he knew it, which is naive because she took a course on it. also, there was another part to the answer about naive that was true as well. can anyone remember the other part. i think it was like to establish a naive persona....</p>
<p>yes for the sentence completion..
although he did not admire.. blablhs' views, he declined joining some group..</p>
<p>and i dont think it was a "new' way to introduce a scientific process
wasn't it a "strange.. or weird" way? but yeah it was A i think</p>
<p>no it wasn't strange
to indroduce
wat were the rob frost answers.</p>
<p>isnt that a little basic</p>
<p>does anyone remember about passage 1 and 2, the voting/polisci one, what their relations were? it was the last question in the section, i just put C but i dont remember what it is</p>
<p>basically, passage two shed new light on scientific findings. passage 1 disparaged the ability of citizens to participate in a democracy</p>