<p>Yeah, I should've brought a watch too. I was in a different room this time and the clock was at the back of the room. I didn't want to keep turning around to look at the clock.</p>
<p>Does anyone know how many math questions you can get wrong and still get 700+.</p>
<p>I fear that I f***ed myself over because I got 4-5 wrong.</p>
<p>Oh, for the math sction, I didn't ommit any.
YEAH for me!!</p>
<p>ommiting is better than getting something wrong...anyways, i'm pretty sure you can get 4-5 wrong and pull off 700+. last time i knew that i got at least 6 or 7 wrong (from this forum), and i got 690.</p>
<p>Guys it was II only.. It did not specify ODD integers or even INTEGERS for that matter (I am like 85% sure). It must be only II.</p>
<p>was that B?</p>
<p>Morever the problem ONLY talked about distance. Nothing else.</p>
<p>my proctor took up my watch because it kept on beeping and i couldnt turn the sound off.</p>
<p>OK, I'm a parent but pulled this up for my son and he looked at a few of the posts on answers, he took the test this AM. He looked over my sholder, shrugged and said "it was alot easier than the on-line practice tests". He felt the vocab was easier. What do you all think? Was that true today?</p>
<p>True. I am horrible on the critical reading section and I feel very confident of my answers. The vocab. was not as hard as it usually is and the passages were better and more understandable.</p>
<p>was the writing paragraph answer to the first question something like "columbus'' or ''to the astonishment of many people''?</p>
<p>i thought the essay was so easy.
the english was easy as well.
the math, on the otherhand.. i thought they were going to give calculators out. they didn't. my SAT prep teacher told us that we were not allowed to use graphing calculators which was a load of BS, so i didn't bring any. so i was pretty much screwed. even though it was pretty easy math, i would have actually finished a few more questions with the calculator.</p>
<p>I am pretty sure it's Columbus</p>
<p>How many no errors did you guys get in the writing part? I think I got 1.</p>
<p>i put to the astonishment of the people because saying columbus is a little redundant because it says it just in the next sentence.... i may be wrong however.. What did u guys put for number 29 I picked d (characteristic should characteristics. I hear people but B (were and they said it should be like was))).</p>
<p>Oh and I got 2 no errors. One on the second one and one about medical school... people keep saying they got three... where is the 3rd one. Someone please help me out..</p>
<p>There were 3 No errors- guys can we agree that Section (1) Diary Passage was experimental? </p>
<p>The 3 no errors were, med school, 2nd one, and the plant one</p>
<p>What about the one that was like:</p>
<p>At the reception were the chattering guests, great music, and lovely cake that have been characteristic of recent weddings.</p>
<p>I said no error. It was the last one, I think.</p>
<p>I put chattering, its a parallelism flaw. Chattering isn't an adjective and the next two clauses are (adj) + (n)</p>
<p>i think i got like two or three no erros. def. more than 1.</p>