<p>"30 line possibilities, I think. I used the counting principle.</p>
<p>6 choices x 5 choices = 30 possible"</p>
<p>I think I had 15, I did it by drawing it out and counting the number of lines I could make.</p>
<p>you almost had it elliott, i made the same mistake but caught myself
it's 5+4+3+2+1 = 15</p>
<p>The six points on the plane was fifteen.</p>
<p>The graph doubled was D, which had it stretched vertically.</p>
<p>elliott34 remember there are three points that are on the same line so some of them can't cross</p>
<p>What about for the one where the numbers were continualy multiplied by negative 2?</p>
<p>I got 28</p>
<p>Crap, oh well, looking back at it, maybe it was 15. That was one of my guesses anyway. Ah well, at least I got that cube/sphere one right!</p>
<p>i don't think it could be 30 because you can't count line AB and line BA twice. Also there was the third point that lied on one of the same lines ( i think??)</p>
<p>does any1 remember getting 100 for the one on the grid ins were they cut equilateral triangles</p>
<p>For the Roosevelt question, I was torn between two choices. I ended up putting this one:</p>
<p>Not only was he a good reformer, but Teddy Roosevelt was also a good president.</p>
<p>sibsagar 12 i got 100=]]]]</p>
<p>oh and the octagon **** was just 7 right?</p>
<p>and what the **** was up with that one question that basically came down to what is 1+1+1+1+2? that seemed too easy
and the one where it was like complete the circle was stupid as ****</p>
<p>for the one where y=2f(x) did you guys choose graph D? nvm, answered before i got there</p>
<p>yes, the equilateral triangle one was 100 (80 * 5/4)</p>
<p>AHHHHHHH!H!!!!! </p>
<p>actually maybe i did do that....but still</p>
<p>for the cutting equilateral triangles i got 90 for the total length</p>
<p>How was it 90 for the question with all those bisectors... wasn't it asking for angle BOE... and I put 120</p>
<p>I chose Not only was he a good reformer; Teddy Roosevelt was also a good president.</p>
<p>Idk on that one though</p>
<p>"What about for the one where the numbers were continualy multiplied by negative 2?</p>
<p>I got 28"</p>
<p>Yeah it was 28. Depending on the method you use, it was either 22+6 or 25+3, both of which come out to 28.</p>
<p>the piece of paper one with equilateral triangles was 18 wasnt it?? that was confusing.</p>
<p>"How was it 90... wasn't it asking for angle BOE... and I put 120"</p>
<p>Yeah I think I got 120 too, or maybe it was 80 but everyone else here got 90.</p>
<p>easton 722 it is a equalateral triangle so the "cut" is 2 in plus the 3 in=5 in. and there are 80/4=20 sections. 20x5=100 in. =]]]</p>