Official November Critical Reading Thread

<p>I had math experimental</p>

<p>The real CR sections were:</p>

<p>1) The indian story (mamapapa)/ The dude who like the socrates painting
2) Biotech
3) Monsters</p>

<p>.....?
anyone got
1. something about animal refuge for short passages and art for long
2. cowboy
3. SETI
????</p>

<p>yup got the SETI one too!
Did you get the cereal and milk math question? lol. I wanna know the ans for q16 (open ended). the...cube thing.</p>

<p>tests are totally different... umm</p>

<p>the answer for the cereal and milk question was something like 5/8... I'm not sure though..
what's the cube thing?</p>

<p>I had passages:
1) Indian girl/father - fisherman
2) art museum architecture
3) human mind/body duality
4) ...cant remember</p>

<p>anyone wanna discuss math on aim with me</p>

<p>YAYYY.</p>

<p>Q16 was the cutting out of a section of the cube (from mid pt of one length to the other).</p>

<p>Oh and did you get k=6 for q17?</p>

<p>I think the answer was an extra 1/2 cup of milk</p>

<p>yeah, i got k=6</p>

<p>oh!! the cube question.. I got 1/8.</p>

<p>Oh dear are you sure.</p>

<p>I put 5/8.</p>

<p>You gotta get 2/3 from 3/2 right?</p>

<p>damndamndamn.</p>

<p>LOL i guessed on 16 and 17=&lt;/p>

<p>k=6 from the diagram, didn't even calculate OOPS.</p>

<p>Sigh, is it auto 760-780 if I missed a math open ended Q :(</p>

<p>2/3 and 3/2 ? -_- I think we are talking about different questions..</p>

<p>actually k=4 for the diagram</p>

<p>Same same. 3/4 cereal mixed with 1/2 cup of milk or something right?</p>

<p>Lol I think it's practically impossible for 2 diff questions (both on cereal and milk!) to have the same ans!>.<</p>

<p>Anyways, I don't even care about my math score since I got 800 in October.
My reading score must improve a lot.</p>

<p>I meant I got 5/8 for the milk question.
And I got 1/8 for the cube question.</p>

<p>Yeah yeah! For SETI... what's the purpose of the passage?
-to argue for an unpopular cause
-to describe an unusual event(?)
-to portray a certain type of scientist</p>

<p>and.</p>

<p>for the writing..</p>

<p>is conformity OF sth wrong?
argh I put no error for that. cos I was thinking one no error was too few. LOL:(</p>

<p>For the passage about biotechnology and crops, was the author of passage 2 saying that the environmentalists have muddled the issue instead of focusing on the central topic?</p>

<p>yeah that was my answer. the others were completely wrong anyways</p>