<p>the car problem was 28,</p>
<p>does anyone remember the exact problem to the car 1?</p>
<p>problem: in 200 cars, 70% are alloy, 60% are 4-door, 50% are red. What is the maximum possible number of green, 2-door, alloy cars?</p>
<p>my reasoning: 140 HAVE TO BE alloy, 100 HAVE TO BE red, 120 HAVE TO BE 4 door. </p>
<p>this means that there are 140 alloy, 100 green, and 80 2-door cars (note that these are independent out of 200, some must overlap). 2-doors is limiting, so we can choose 80 green, 20door, and alloy</p>
<p>the answer was 80.....</p>
<p>Nevermind, i am way wrong.</p>
<p>It was something like:</p>
<p>There are 200 cars in a parking lot. 50% are red, 60% are four-door cars, and 70% have alloy wheel trims. What is the maximum number of green, two-door cars with alloy wheel trims?</p>
<p>I put 80, because 100 cars are red and 120 are four-door. So you can assume that 120 cars are red and/or have four door, and the rest don't. That means that 200-120=80 cars have just alloy wheels, which is lower than the number of cars that have alloy wheels in total (140).</p>
<p>What about the CR question that asked who the writer of Passage 1 wanted to be most like: was the answer the "two men?"</p>
<p>And, also, which statement best supported the writer's "rationalizations?" Was it the description of the two men?</p>
<p>yeah, i put that he wanted to be most like the two men. first i was going to say that he wanted to be the "hiker", but .... then i read back and i think its the "two men".</p>
<p>WAIT-- the tone was EARNEST?</p>
<p>i said hikers since the the author of passage 1 describes his rationalizations then his fears. the author of passage describes hiker's surrounding fear then the two men who appeared like savages. I really thought this was a parallel so.....</p>
<p>and yeah i put conversational/something but now realize that humor/earnest seems to fit, even tho i didn't find the firs passage very humorous</p>
<p>The choices were:</p>
<p>a. argumentative/objective
b. something
c. conversational/scholarly
d. something /w big words
e. humorous/earnest</p>
<p>yes, earnest...</p>
<p>thank god...i know i got 5 right so far</p>
<p>there was an option with "bitter".</p>
<p>i put conversational/ scholarly.</p>
<p>the first phrase wasnt humorous</p>
<p>i picked humorus/earnest bc the first one had fragments of "humor" in there, similar to the dumb jokes in the apush american pagent boook...what did u guys pick for the one c.r. about co-workers arguing..i think i chose either quabble or affirmative i kept switching</p>
<p>It was diatribe.</p>
<p>Yeah, the last sentence of the first passage was something like "I can just imagine a city-dweller getting chewed up by a bear." I just remember that it was moderately humorous.</p>
<p>oh. haha. that's... funny.
not really. anyway....
you know the korean girls views on going to korea? was that political and soemthing else?
or naive or something? idealistic?</p>
<p>no way, I think it was conversational/scholarly because the passage 1 wrote as if he was talking. "I am going to get me fit"</p>
<p>Thinking about it, conversation/scholarly does sound better</p>
<p>I put humorous/ earnest b/c the second part of Passage 1 was like the PS3 vs. 360 console wars, absolute crap. Passage 2 was something straight out of a sermon.</p>
<p>I wonder what I'll get now, what is like 2-3 wrong on the CR</p>