<p>@1golfer1 It was chronological because the narrator described changes in her life over time. It was vexed because enraged seemed too strong an emotion, and the author just sounded annoyed. I put more indignant because the author seemed snippy about humans being subjected to behavioral techniques. I agree with you that “doing it” should be “doing so”, though.</p>
<p>@icecreamcake7 Same. I’m pretty sure I did worse on this one. :(</p>
<p>Was it really chronological narrative? I put philosophical reflection…</p>
<p>Chronological Narrative is right: in the first two paragraphs there were no reflections, he just stated in order how he went to the dolphin training place and then applied those tactics at home as well after he got back. So it was chronology and it was like a story so chronological narrative</p>
<p>for the behavorial one I put control destiny as well because it mentioned those people believed in free will.</p>
<p>I thought it was impromptu. Age is still relevant because she’s interviewing the guy, and his age is part of him. The “exhausted her repertoire” gives it away because that suggests she ran out of questions and had to make one up on the fly</p>
<p>yeah I got a 231 last year and this one seemed harder so I hope the curve is better. </p>
<p>@meaa7130 probably a 70 or so. -3 is usually around a 72.</p>
<p>@SentientBacon Hmm, I understand your argument, but based on the phrase “exhausting her repertoire”, impromptu is probably supported more.</p>
<p>indignant vs businesslike was really tough. I put businesslike but I’m not sure. Business like is kinda short and to the point, not formal, so the woof doesn’t disqualify it. Since the passage skipped anecdotes and went right to the argument, it seemed businesslike. But indignant makes sense too</p>
<p>So what was the verdict for the more businesslike/more indignant question?</p>
<p>@schakrab What were the other choices for the control destiny question?</p>
<p>@SentientBacon I felt the same way. The questions seemed different from any practice tests I’ve taken. I just hope I made the cutoff since I would’ve last year…I’ll be mad if I don’t </p>
<p>-3 last year was a 730 for me and I think this year the passages were way trickier. </p>
<p>@icecreamcake7 Yes, I put “active role in shaping destiny” as well.</p>
<p>@xkcd12345 The canyon questions were okay. I think one I had trouble with had to do with the quote about ‘if one million people visit the canyon than they only experience 1 millionth of P’. I said something about the value being proportional to the number of visitors. Another asked about the fixed rate of P. . . I just put down unchanging. Um… The government opened the park because they wanted to share the explorer’s experience with everyone. The difference between the two sees was something about the first being like literally seeing the canyon will the second was discovering. There was a question about which example is this preformed conception closest to and I put the answer with listening to your favorite song on a CD then being upset when it isn’t the same in concert. Sorry. Trying to remember more. </p>
<p>Couldn’t the reporter asking the sensei about his age be “probing?”.</p>
<p>@NotAMathlete I put those answers as well</p>
<p>so for the inventions short passages: the second one supported the first because she made inventions based on what she saw as problems. It wasn’t necessity, you can still grind grain without a mill, but it solves a problem/human suffering.</p>
<p>Also in that set some other answers: “Author 1 would say that the inventor followed the normal cause of inventions” despite her inventing different things
Also “Her inventions were more basic”</p>
<p>@NotAMathlete I put the same answers.</p>
<p>@meaa7130 I put chronological narrative, because the author was describing how his life changed from training dolphins to later applying those techniques to his real life.</p>
<p>Was the dolphin passage question that compare the two: passage 1 talks about pragmatic something and idk what passage 2 was… Philosophical something?</p>