<p>did you guys say no error for the high rise, one can see attestss ot the blah blah blah?</p>
<p>PSAT is harder than the SAT/ACT so don’t worry unless you really really want to make National Merit or something</p>
<p>I got a 231 on last year’s PSAT, 2340 on the SAT, and 36 on the ACT
A dude I know got like a 219 on the PSAT and a 2370 on the SAT. </p>
<p>my no errors were: the high rise (attests to) etc, the books that had lain, and the blues/jazz musician named bo something. am i right?</p>
<p>@icequeenforever I thought it was supporting because the grain mill wasn’t exactly necessary she made it because she wanted to improve the existing conditions </p>
<p>Can someone predict my score:
CR: -3/4
M: -1/2
W: -1/2</p>
<p>dang. @schakrab</p>
<p>undermining vs supporting and businesslike vs indignant were two really hard ones. I’m fairly sure it’s supporting, but I have no idea on businesslike vs indignant</p>
<p>i really thought it was supporting as well… thats the way i interpreted it… but are the short passages usually contradictory? </p>
<p>@austin you probably got over 220 but under 230</p>
<p>@Icecreamcake
agreed, it wasn’t really necessary, but she felt that it would help the people because she felt the frustration of making it by hand. You can still do it by hand though, so it’s not absolutely necessary</p>
<p>I think it would lean a little to businesslike since both the authors were to the same extent (i think) indignant… but maybe not… ugh i hate this.</p>
<p>I said businesslike because it was more to the point. The first passage was also slightly indignant I thought, because it complained about the misinterpretations of behaviorism</p>
<p>Darn, I was hoping for the national merit. College wise my financial situation is basically ‘too high to qualify for financial aid but low enough to need financial aid.’</p>
<p>Also I have two siblings. :S</p>
<p>For the one where you had to add a number to 135 to get an average out of 7 greater than 23 and less than 23.5, did that number have to be an integer? i put 26.7 and everyone else put integer answers</p>
<p>I really thought that the two invention articles were contrasting, since there was even a line in the second about her invention being completely different than the ones lauded in today’s world (plasma tv’s, ipads, etc) which are things that aren’t necessities.</p>
<p>Yes @meaa7130</p>
<p>Was the writing question about cranes no error. Or was the error in attests to. I thought it should have been attest to</p>
<p>what was the indignant question about? i remember putting that</p>
<p>@Mango920452 no error</p>
<p>@meaa7130 They are, so undermining seems more logical because it shows contrast.</p>