<p>Yeah the answer a few question down was the passage 1 interpretation, and if you wanted them to match, then you’d see they are not contradictory (at least that was how I did it)</p>
<p>yeah that’s a good point too. The first passage was kinda indignant too but it was definitely less businesslike because it had anecdotes and took about 2-3 paragraphs to get to the point. </p>
<p>I said the second supported the first because in the first they said something to the effect of ‘it’s not necessary… But comes as a result of frustration with the existing technology and I guess a desire to make it better.’</p>
<p>In the second the woman creates ‘labor saving devices’ but they aren’t necessary. There was a part that said something like 'You don’t know how hard it is to use a hand mill until…) </p>
<p>For the stone ruins I could’ve sworn it said ‘the stone ruins’ so I left stands. . I thought the problem was with the end of the sentence where it said ‘nobody knows why they did it’ . . . Because it was unclear what it was I guess. </p>
<p>Also… After looking at the google doc …I also feel like on the circle question one of the circles had a radius of 2… </p>